Connection Search Results
You searched for:
all feedback for this connection
(signing in could show even more results)
It would be really useful to represent system values to be used in code as constants rather than having to hard code integer values.
This means that lookup tables can use nice tinyints as the surr…
Created on 1/27/2007 (updated 1 week ago) | 3 workarounds | 14 comments | feedback id: 254293
|
|
I was excited when I heard that Katmai would have table parameters, but I was
equally disappointed to hear that they would be readonly. Today programmers
employ various tricks to pass table data betwe…
Created on 9/23/2007 (updated 3 hours ago) | 0 workarounds | 15 comments | feedback id: 299296
|
|
Since I couldn't find a category called something like "T-SQL Syntax" I decided to post this here.
Maybe I missed something in the CTP docs, but it appears that I will still have to do object exist…
Created on 11/3/2005 (updated 6 days ago) | 4 workarounds | 12 comments | feedback id: 127219
|
|
A few problems with LOOKUP component:
1) Cannot set SQL statement that populates the LOOKUP cache dynamically. This means you cannot dynamically filter teh data in the cache - it would be a good idea…
Created on 11/28/2005 (updated 4 weeks ago) | 0 workarounds | 3 comments | feedback id: 127229
|
|
SQL 1999 and later include the <distinct predicate> IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM.
The definition of distinct is (quoting from the 2003 standard) "informally, not equal, not both null." This is consistent…
Created on 7/7/2007 (updated 1 week ago) | 0 workarounds | 3 comments | feedback id: 286422
|
|
SQL Server 2005 introduced only partial support for the OVER clause. It is our strong believe that a more complete implementation of the OVER clause should be prioritized highly in consideration for f…
Created on 1/28/2007 (updated 10 hours ago) | 0 workarounds | 7 comments | feedback id: 254388
|
|
SQL Server 2005 introduced only partial support for the OVER clause. It is our strong believe that a more complete implementation of the OVER clause should be prioritized highly in consideration for f…
Created on 1/28/2007 (updated 10 hours ago) | 0 workarounds | 1 comment | feedback id: 254387
|
|
SQL Server 2005 introduced only partial support for the OVER clause. It is our strong believe that a more complete implementation of the OVER clause should be prioritized highly in consideration for f…
Created on 1/28/2007 (updated 10 hours ago) | 0 workarounds | 1 comment | feedback id: 254397
|
|
Changing the order of columns in a table requires the table to be dropped and recreated. As i look at the system tables, the order is simply stored as an integer but to change it requires a potential…
Created on 5/16/2005 (updated 1 week ago) | 1 workaround | 13 comments | feedback id: 124781
|
|
Synonyms provide a great layer of abstraction, allowing us to use friendly and/or local names for verbosely named or remote tables, views, procedures and functions. I have often felt that they are la…
Created on 11/18/2007 (updated 2 weeks ago) | 0 workarounds | 7 comments | feedback id: 311079
|
|