Rvalue reference overloading rules by weibing

Closed

as Fixed

Type:	Bug
ID:	725876
Opened:	2/21/2012 1:43:24 AM
Access Restriction:	Public
Moderator Decision:	Sent to Engineering Team for consideration

Workaround(s)

view

User(s) can reproduce this bug

void Foo(int*&&)
{
}

void Foo(int*&)
{
}

int main()
{
    Foo(new int); //will call "void Foo(int*&)"
    Foo(new int()); //will call "void Foo(int*&&)". initialize POD to zero will also affect efficiency
    return 0;
}

Details (expand)

Visual Studio 2010 SP1

compile the code

English

Windows 7

English

Foo(new int); //will call "void Foo(int*&)"
Foo(new int()); //will call "void Foo(int*&&)"

Foo(new int); //will call "void Foo(int*&&)"
Foo(new int()); //will call "void Foo(int*&&)"

0 attachments

Posted by Microsoft on 2/22/2012 at 2:13 PM

Hi:
A fix for this issue has been checked into the compiler sources. The fix should show up in the next release of Visual C++.

Xiang Fan
Visual C++ Team

Posted by MS-Moderator09 [Feedback Moderator] on 2/21/2012 at 9:29 PM

Thank you for submitting feedback on Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework. Your issue has been routed to the appropriate VS development team for review. We will contact you if we require any additional information.

Posted by MS-Moderator01 on 2/21/2012 at 2:42 AM

Thank you for your feedback, we are currently reviewing the issue you have submitted. If this issue is urgent, please contact support directly(http://support.microsoft.com)

Microsoft