Search
Closed
as Won't Fix Help for as Won't Fix

1
Sign in to vote
0
Sign in to vote
Sign in
to vote
Type: Suggestion
ID: 497312
Opened: 10/12/2009 3:46:10 AM
Access Restriction: Public
0
Workaround(s)
In our models we use sub-numbering. We are missing a declarative way to specify this.

The generation of sub-numbers might have a lot to do with calculated fields in "M". Yet it is important that a sub-number is stable; when the number is given to an entity, it may not change.
("it may not change": we might change it by hand but the value is derived only once, and then stored. So sub-number "3" stays "3" even though entities "1" and "2" have been deleted.)

In our model the sub-number depends on the type[M] and model type[our model, derivable]. Each new sub-number works just like a regular sequence.

Sub numbers are also frequently (if not always) used in billing.
Details (expand)
What area of the product is your feedback for?
Oslo Models

What distribution are you using?

Oslo SDK CTP - May 2009
How important is this requirement?
Important Need (Workaround available)
File Attachments
0 attachments
Sign in to post a comment.