﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - Windows Communication Foundation (Indigo)</title><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/default.aspx</link><description>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - Windows Communication Foundation (Indigo)</description><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;#169; 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:30:14 -0800</lastBuildDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124241</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124241</link><author>cicorias</author><category>Bug</category><title>COM Integration with Service Moniker using WSDL doesn't work with non default namespace (tempuri.org)</title><description>Wsdl deserialization has issue with service that has namespace other than http://tempuri.org/

If remove the attribute from the Service class:
 [ServiceContract(
   //Namespace = "http://PracticalWcf/QuoteService"
 )]

Regen the proxy and change the moniker as follows:

wsdl = ReadWsdlFromFile ( "TempUri.service.svc.wsdl" )
moniker="service:wsdl=" &amp; wsdl &amp; ", "
moniker=moniker + "address=http://localhost/QuickReturnsQuotes/service.svc,"
moniker=moniker + "contract=IQuoteService, cont...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 5 comments, feedback id: 124241</description><a10:updated>2006-08-18T13:20:25-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124242</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124242</link><author>ErikB1</author><category>Bug</category><title>Using the Namespace argument for the ServiceBehavior attribute causes a StackOverflowException</title><description>When trying to use the Namespace argument for the ServiceBehavior attribute, the service host fails to start an throws a StackOverflowException originating in System.ServiceModel.

Using the .NET Reflector, the following code seems to cause the error:
public string ServiceBehaviorAttribute.Namespace
{
      get
      {
            return this.serviceNamespace;
      }
      set
      {
            // Note the cycle!
            this.Namespace = value;
      }
}&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124242</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:38-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124243</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124243</link><author>Nizar Jalal</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Support sgen-like assembly generation for DataContract serialization (DataContractSerializer)</title><description>The first service call from a client takes very long to execute.  This delay could be attributed to the generation of serializers for data contracts.

The delay, which is around 70 seconds in our case, slows the application start time.  This not only affects the user experience, it also slows development because of delays caused in debugging.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124243</description><a10:updated>2006-08-10T11:49:13-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124244</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124244</link><author>TimEwald</author><category>Bug</category><title>svcutil fails if WSDL fault references an XSD element that uses an anonymous type</title><description>svcutil fails if the XSD element for a fault contains an anonymous type.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124244</description><a10:updated>2006-07-12T14:17:24-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124245</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124245</link><author>Fabio Cozzolino</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Contract-First: Add serverInterface parameter to svcutil</title><description>To support Contract-First you can add /serverInterface parameter to svcutil.ext tool, similar to wsdl.exe tool.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 2 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124245</description><a10:updated>2007-08-13T07:20:04-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124246</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124246</link><author>cicorias</author><category>Bug</category><title>Order of WSDL impacts Proxy Generation Code</title><description>If I have WSDL that lists the input message before the output message then the proxy generation parent is ClientBase.

If however, the output message comes before the input message for an operation then the proxy's parent is DuplexClientBase.

The following generates a proxy who's parent is ClientBase (using the url http://localhost:8888/ExchangeWeb/TradeService.svc?wsdl=wsdl1):

- &lt;wsdl:operation name="TradeSecurity"&gt;
  &lt;wsdl:input wsa10:Action="http://PracticalWcf/Exchange/TradeService/...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 5 comments, feedback id: 124246</description><a10:updated>2006-07-10T18:49:16-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124247</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124247</link><author>Hernan de Lahitte</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Full Trust requirements in WCF</title><description>The current version of WCF does not supports being used by a partially trusted caller. 
This scenario is likely to be applied in all services that are hosted in a partially trusted enviromment configuration.
As I know so far, this is by design but I think that many of us would like to know if this will be suported in upcoming versions or in the next RTM v1.0.
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124247</description><a10:updated>2006-07-11T11:43:10-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124248</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124248</link><author>AndyMauer</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>WAS and Process Models</title><description>Hi @all,

I remember a discussion about robust process models when it comes to the service implementation long time ago before WAS was in the scope.

In the pre-WCF era and when approaching SO based solution architectures on the .NET platform, the ASMX model was the preferred one. However, using the ASP .NET worker process model was not an optimal process model for long running activities inside the service implementation since the ASMX sponsored worker process is tuned for responsiveness an...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124248</description><a10:updated>2006-08-24T23:41:04-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124249</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124249</link><author>ACHawk</author><category>Bug</category><title>add Service Ref -&gt; changes Data contract member names.</title><description>When I do the Service Ref add changes the names of my data contract members.
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124249</description><a10:updated>2006-08-11T14:58:30-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124250</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124250</link><author>AndresVisual</author><category>Bug</category><title>NetTcpBinding</title><description>When you allow a service in IIS, based in a netcpbinding. I give the error "The netcpbinding is not supported". I was searching in forums and I found that this binding is not supported in IIS 5 and 6. is it truth?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 124250</description><a10:updated>2006-08-09T09:43:21-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124251</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124251</link><author>Yggdrasil</author><category>Bug</category><title>SVCUTIL cannot create metadata from EXE assemblies, only DLLs.</title><description>When attempting to generate WSDL metadata from an EXE assembly that contains a ServiceContract or DataContract using the svcutil.exe tool, an error is returned.
If the same assembly is renamed to a DLL, it works as expected.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124251</description><a10:updated>2006-08-10T13:04:42-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124252</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124252</link><author>ttuscher</author><category>Bug</category><title>MembershipProvider:  Custom Username and Password exception.</title><description>I created a custom MembershipProvider by extending the System.Web.MembershipProvider class.  This Membership provider was registered with the following configuration.  In the client app, I set the username and password and invoke the WCF Service.  The ValidateUser method of the MembershipProvider is invoked.  If this method returns a true, everything is fine.  If the ValidateUser method returns a false, a System.TimeoutException is thrown.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Resolved, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124252</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:41-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124253</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124253</link><author>sixmileal</author><category>Bug</category><title>Default Msmq Binding Sample Does not work in disconnected environment.</title><description>Compiling and running the Msmq sample when not connected to a domain produces an error indcating 'certificate does not exist'. This is according to the documentation a correct response and a suggestion is provided to turn off transport security (see sample in docs). However, if the sample is run with the modification to the config file a fault is generated indicating that the 'security' token is not recognized. Apparently a parser error.
I then tried to make the change programatically by instan...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124253</description><a10:updated>2006-08-25T11:53:59-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124254</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124254</link><author>HowardRichards</author><category>Bug</category><title>Workflow HandleExternalEventActivity issue when used in ASP.NET</title><description>HandlleExternalEventActivity seems to be broken in Win Workflow Foundation when used with ManualWorkflowScheduler under ASP.NET and a State machine workflow. May also only occur when used with persistence?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 3 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 2 validations, 1 workaround, 4 comments, feedback id: 124254</description><a10:updated>2007-10-10T07:32:07-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124255</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124255</link><author>Fabio Cozzolino</author><category>Bug</category><title>WinFx Service directive</title><description>When I create a new WinFx Service in ASP.NET application (IIS), the declaration tag @Service throw an exception of type 'System.Web.HttpParseException'.	
It must be @ServiceHost.

Software: 
- WinFx Runtime Component February 2006 CTP 
- Windows SDK for the February 2006 CTP
- Microsoft Visual Studio Code Name “Orcas” CTP - Development Tools for WinFX&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124255</description><a10:updated>2006-08-24T23:40:29-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124256</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124256</link><author>A.Guerot</author><category>Bug</category><title>ServiceContract and DataContract must be in the same assembly for XsdDataContractExported.Export to succeed</title><description>If a ServiceContract and a corresponding DataContract are not defined in the same assembly, XsdDataContractExported.Export fails.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124256</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:42-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124257</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124257</link><author>Marcin Kosieradzki</author><category>Bug</category><title>Metadata generation for ServiceKnownType does not work</title><description>Metadata generation for ServiceKnownType does not generate KnownType which is available in xsd=xsd1.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 6 comments, feedback id: 124257</description><a10:updated>2008-11-24T08:43:02-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124258</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124258</link><author>pgaliano</author><category>Bug</category><title>SvcUtil /n switch not working with a Serializable class</title><description>SvcUtil /n not working with a Serializable class&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 124258</description><a10:updated>2006-07-10T13:39:33-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124259</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124259</link><author>pgaliano</author><category>Bug</category><title>SvcTraceViewer is not showing the correct Description</title><description>After configuring WCF Host tracing capabilities and making a trace call of level Information on the service implementation, the SvcTraceViewer utility is not showing the correct description column for the logged entry.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 4 comments, feedback id: 124259</description><a10:updated>2006-08-08T22:33:51-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124260</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124260</link><author>pgaliano</author><category>Bug</category><title>SVCTraceViewer doesnt show the correct Trace Level</title><description>After configuring a WCF Host Tracing features, and making a trace call of level information on the service implementation, the SvcTraceViewer utility is not showing the corresponding trace level for the entry logged.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124260</description><a10:updated>2006-08-08T22:33:50-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124261</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124261</link><author>wmmihaa</author><category>Bug</category><title>Unable to load one or more of the requested types. Retrieve the LoaderExceptions property for more information [Windows Workflow Foundation]</title><description>This bug belongs to Windows Workflow Foundation, but there was no such item in the list of Product/Technology.

I’m experiencing some problems while working with wf in visual studio.
Sometimes while building or rebuilding the solution, the build fails, and NO exceptions are given. Opening the workflow file (workflow.cs) will show an exception in the designer:
“Unable to load one or more of the requested types. Retrieve the LoaderExceptions property for more information.”
I don’t know what i...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124261</description><a10:updated>2006-08-24T23:40:28-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124262</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124262</link><author>Krzys Ostrowski</author><category>Bug</category><title>Uninstall tool is interactive even in "quiet" mode.</title><description>The uninstall tool for WinFx (vs_uninst_winfx) is interactive despite selecting the /Q option. I have ~280 nodes to upgrade from January CTP to February CTP, how do I do this without reimaging them all? &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124262</description><a10:updated>2006-08-22T18:44:22-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124263</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124263</link><author>pgaliano</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>svcutil datacontract generation</title><description>When trying to generate a DataContract using a xml schema that does not conform to DataContract rules and exception is thrown&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 0 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 workarounds, 4 comments, feedback id: 124263</description><a10:updated>2006-07-11T18:41:59-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124264</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124264</link><author>pgaliano</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>DataContract creation from a xml schema</title><description>Data Contract serializer doesnt support xml attributes, plus other limitations, so when you try to create a DataContract from a xml schema with attributes, an Exception is thrown.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124264</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:44-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124265</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124265</link><author>pgaliano</author><category>Bug</category><title>VS Intellisense on WCF Fec CTP</title><description>After installing WinFX Feb CTP, I lost the intellisense support under the xml configuration files.

I checked the file C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\Xml\Schemas\DotNetConfig.xsd, but is doesn’t have any pointer to WCF.
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Resolved, Resolution: Fixed, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 124265</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:44-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124266</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124266</link><author>pgaliano</author><category>Bug</category><title>SvcConfigEditor doesnt open a configuration file</title><description>SvcConfigEditor doesnt open a configuration file passed as an argument when executed from the command line&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124266</description><a10:updated>2006-08-28T21:14:17-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124267</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124267</link><author>monahk</author><category>Bug</category><title>Windows XP 64 bit + SP1: Copying a file &gt; 2GB with a filesystem type=FAT generates an error from both shell32 and command line</title><description>Windows XP 64 bit + SP1: Copying a file &gt; 2GB with a filesystem type=FAT generates an error from both shell32 and command line.
The bug only repro's on a FAT filesystem. When I converted the filesystem to ntfs the problem did not repro.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 124267</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:44-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124268</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124268</link><author>A.Guerot</author><category>Bug</category><title>The MaxMessageSize value defined in the config file is not loaded once the service is started (MaxMessageSize is set to its default value)</title><description>When I set the MaxMessageSize to a value different from the default value the value is not applied to the binding once the service is started in a servicehost. This is regardless of the binding type (the error occurs with WSHTTPBInding, NetNamedPipeBinding adn NetTcpBinding).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 2 comments, feedback id: 124268</description><a10:updated>2006-07-19T11:54:12-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124269</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124269</link><author>Marcin Kosieradzki</author><category>Bug</category><title>Bug when typed dataset and Guid in one operation contract</title><description>There is supposingly a bug in proxy generation. I have created a following contract:

[ServiceContract()]
public interface ITasksService
{
  [OperationContract]
  void CreateTask(TasksDataSet task);
  
  [OperationContract]
  TasksDataSet GetTaskById(Guid taskId);

  [OperationContract]
  TasksDataSet GetTasksByWorkflow(Guid workflowId);
  
  [OperationContract]
  TasksDataSet GetTasksByCategory(Guid categoryId);

  [OperationContract]
  void DeleteTask(Guid taskId);
}

Task...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124269</description><a10:updated>2006-08-09T10:32:05-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124270</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124270</link><author>AkashAgg</author><category>Bug</category><title>Network Connectivity Lost After Following Installation Guide at http://windowscommunication.net/collateral/pages/installing.htm</title><description>I lost my network connection totally after following the procedures for installations as specified in http://windowscommunication.net/collateral/pages/installing.htm

Operation System Windows Server 2003
Visual Studio 2005 Standard Edition ( The free copy I received at the MSDN launch event)

I even tried on a clean Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition and same results.

I believe the lost I might have happened after I installed Windows SDK.

Finally I gave up and reinstalled Windows Se...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124270</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:45-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124271</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124271</link><author>qbjohan</author><category>Bug</category><title>Defining namespaces on DataMembers?</title><description>The DataMemberAttribute class is missing the Namespace property. I saw an example of this here http://blogs.msdn.com/craigmcmurtry/archive/2006/02/01/522353.aspx.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 4 comments, feedback id: 124271</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:45-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124272</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124272</link><author>Gary50</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Gary Buchanan</title><description>Spam E-Mail&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124272</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:45-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124273</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124273</link><author>geoff.wilson</author><category>Bug</category><title>Compacting in Outlook Express loses email</title><description>I don't think the choices above for Version and Category have anything to do with my problem.  I am running Outlook Express, version 6.00.2900.2180, according to Outlook Express Help.  I have accumulated a very large number of email messages in both Inbox and Sent.  I keep these as an important history of business communications, etc.  Upon exiting Outlook I am sometimes prompted to Compact to save space.  On two occasions now the compacting process has lost hundreds of my messages.  On the firs...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124273</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:46-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124274</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124274</link><author>quantum00</author><category>Bug</category><title>Cannot have multiple endpoints for an IIS hosted service</title><description>When you setup a service with more than one endpoint, both actually use the FIRST endpoint binding.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 4 comments, feedback id: 124274</description><a10:updated>2006-07-13T19:46:13-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124275</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124275</link><author>quantum00</author><category>Bug</category><title>Cannot have multiple endpoints for a service</title><description>The following code should work beautifuly...

   Uri basicHttpUri = new
Uri("http://localhost:8081/Service/");
            Uri httpDualUri = new
Uri("http://localhost:8082/Service/");
            ServiceHost hService = new
ServiceHost(typeof(DemoService));

            hService.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IDemoService), new
BasicHttpBinding( ), basicHttpUri);
            hService.AddServiceEndpoint(typeof(IDemoService), new
WSDualHttpBinding( ), httpDualUri);

            hService.Op...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 3 comments, feedback id: 124275</description><a10:updated>2006-07-10T12:35:08-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124276</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124276</link><author>quantum00</author><category>Bug</category><title>svcutil.exe is camelCasing Properties!</title><description>svcutil.exe is camelCasing properties.  This is a critical bug as I am in the Go-live now and none of our proxies are being generated in a way that allows us to ACTUALLY use this!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 4 comments, feedback id: 124276</description><a10:updated>2006-07-10T11:58:47-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124277</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124277</link><author>Sebastian Kralemann</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Configuring role-based authorization through a configuration file</title><description>Dear Microsoft,

I was looking for a way to implement a role-based authorization for a WCF service using windows security.
I found that I can configure the access to service operations with the PrincipalPermission attribute, but the big disadvantage of using this attribute is that everything is hard-coded in the service operations implementation.
In Enterprise Services / COM+ it is possible to change the access permissions for service operations through the Component Services administration ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124277</description><a10:updated>2006-08-21T16:58:43-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124278</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124278</link><author>Litodam</author><category>Bug</category><title>Service one-way operation does not work as expected when hosting the service in IIS</title><description>When trying to create a one-way service operation the behaviour is not as expected. I've installed the Service Contract One Way Sample to see how it works and found that the one-way operation works fine when the service is hosted in a console application process but it doesn't work when hosted in IIS; in this case the behaviour is not as expected because the client waits for the service execution to complete.
Im' using December CTP, ASPNET 2.0.50727, Windows Server 2003 SP1.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 4 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 2 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124278</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:47-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124279</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124279</link><author>Sebastian Kralemann</author><category>Bug</category><title>svcutil service contracts and proxy class are in the global namespace</title><description>Hi!

I am using the December CTP!
I have generated a proxy class with svcutil and I observed that the generated service contracts and the generated proxy class are always in the global namespace. In contrast to a generated DataContract which is in the right namespace.
In the service implementation I specified no 'Name' and 'Namespace' parameters for the 'ServiceContract' attribute, so it should be used the original name and namespace.
Is this behavoir by design?

Kind regards
Sebastian&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124279</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:47-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124280</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124280</link><author>fdelacou</author><category>Bug</category><title>Wrong documentation for naming an endpoint: configurationName not a valid attribute</title><description>Version is actually December CTP and not Nov CTP.

I've tried to add a reference to the weather service from ejse.com to my project. Everything seems to have worked properly except that trying to create the proxy without any parameter does not work. The app.config does not contain any name. Trying to add configuration name as specified in ms-help://MS.VSCC.v80/MS.MSDN.v80/MS.WinFX4VS.1033/WCF_con/html/d067b86d-afb0-47bf-94f6-45180a3d8d78.htm returns a warning that the configurationName is not ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Resolved, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124280</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:47-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124281</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124281</link><author>pierregreborio</author><category>Bug</category><title>svcutil doesn't generate enpoint name</title><description>When generating the configuration file for a service with svcutil the endpoint element doesn't have a name attribute set.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124281</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:48-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124282</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124282</link><author>Krzys Ostrowski</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Add an easy way to immediately see WSDL definitions corresponding to a given interface.</title><description>Since there is no way an interface can be generated from WSDL in Indigo, it would be desirable to be able to quickly and easily see a WSDL coresponding to a given interface, like e.g. as an option in context menu etc., without the need to deploy a service and check its WSDL via a browser, so that a programmer can have a quick feedback as to whether the interface he's just written bears any similarity to some known WSDL he's trying to match. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124282</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:48-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124283</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124283</link><author>Krzys Ostrowski</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Add an easy way to define interfaces compliant with port types in arbitrary WS-... specifications.</title><description>I would like to write services implementing message exchanges defined in various WS-... specifications. I don't see a way to achieve this without generating and parsing XML myself. I would be nice if there was some sort of support that allows me to write an ordinary interface and, decorating it with some attributes, easily make its WSDL compatible with message exchanges as defined in this or another WS-... specification. This would allow programmers to write code compliant with these widely-used...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124283</description><a10:updated>2006-08-17T19:32:48-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124284</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124284</link><author>FrankBuckley</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Enable declarative specification of OperationRequirements</title><description>The &lt;serviceAuthorization&gt; element permits the specification of a single OperationRequirement for a single EndpointBehavior. To specify different OperationRequirements for different services, multiple Behaviors have to be configured. If you have many services in an application that otherwise all share the same behaviours (authorisation, credentials, security audit) this quickly becomes unwieldy. Also, it is often desirable to insist at development time that a particular service implementation or...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 124284</description><a10:updated>2006-08-14T17:29:16-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124285</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124285</link><author>FrankBuckley</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Provide client &lt;profiles&gt; in config to group &lt;endpoint&gt; configurations</title><description>A client's endpoints configuration may vary depending on their network location (internal, Internet, etc.) and activity (debugging, testing, deployed). At present, there seems to be no way to group different sets of endpoint configurations in config (that could then be chosen between at runtime).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124285</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:49-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124286</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124286</link><author>Alex Warshavsky</author><category>Bug</category><title>User-agent HTTP header is missing from web services request</title><description>When a web service request is being made, User-Agent http header is missing from the request.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Resolved, Resolution: Postponed, 4 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 2 validations, 0 workarounds, 4 comments, feedback id: 124286</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:49-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124287</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124287</link><author>chris_dk</author><category>Bug</category><title>Managed C++ app fails when Windows SDK is not installed</title><description>This is not a new bug, but I could not reopen bug FDBK37279.

The app described in FDBK37279 fails even when November CTP is installed.

The Windows SDK (that includes WinFX November CTP) needs to be installed. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 5 comments, feedback id: 124287</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:49-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124288</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124288</link><author>Sundararajan</author><category>Bug</category><title>ServiceHost Class is no more accepting Generic type parameter in nov. CTP</title><description>Hi,

I am trying to build the indigo services sample from the  and oops it does  fails here.
using (ServiceHost&lt;SampleService&gt; serviceHost = 
               new ServiceHost&lt;SampleService&gt;();
It says that servicehost class does not accept type parameters.
I removed the type parameters now comes the other one. ServiceHost class's parameterless constructors is not accessible since it is declared protected.

Things goes fine without type parameters and the uri and type specified as the param...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124288</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:49-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124289</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124289</link><author>Krzys Ostrowski</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Auto-generate .NET-style interface from WSDL specification.</title><description>In many situations one has to deal with contracts defined elsewhere in WSDL, for example when doing some implementation conforming with various WS-xxx specifications. It would be nice if I could drag a WSDL into the project and have the appropriate interface generated automatically, so that in my own code I don't have to worry about WSDL or SOAP. 

There is a way to generate a contract based on an interface in WCF now and link to it on the client, but that's only useful if I know the interface...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124289</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:50-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">124290</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=124290</link><author>Krzys Ostrowski</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Add implementation of WS-Notification and similar specs.</title><description>This is a popular, widely used standard. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Postponed, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 124290</description><a10:updated>2006-06-08T05:07:50-07:00</a10:updated></item></channel></rss>