﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - Windows Networking</title><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/default.aspx</link><description>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - Windows Networking</description><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;#169; 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:30:15 -0800</lastBuildDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><guid isPermaLink="false">20648</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=20648</link><author>knswank</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>MSN Beta Mail</title><description>I love the new gmail by google.  I wish hotmail could use many of their features and vibrant colors!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 20648</description><a10:updated>2006-06-03T07:14:07-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">21715</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=21715</link><author>Pat McGee</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Confused(!)(?)</title><description>Please email me at - "kennethpatrickmcgee@msn.com," I don't know where to start but am very interested.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 21715</description><a10:updated>2006-06-03T07:14:07-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">22897</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=22897</link><author>lameo</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>WinInet HTTP version handling</title><description>WinInet doesn't use the developer's desired http version input to HttpOpenRequest when going through a proxy server AND using SSL&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 22897</description><a10:updated>2006-06-03T07:14:07-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">31920</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=31920</link><author>RicarDog</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>TransmitFile should support files bigger than 2GB</title><description>It seems that the function TransmitFile currently supports files up to 2GB in size. It should support files bigger than that. Also, the DWORD parameters should be upgraded so we can specify numbers greater than 2^32.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 31920</description><a10:updated>2006-06-03T07:14:07-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">60068</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=60068</link><author>Gregmart</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Link broken</title><description>Link to HTTP Server API Version 2.0 is broken
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/http/http/http_api_version_2_0_reference.asp?frame=true
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 60068</description><a10:updated>2006-08-11T10:29:03-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85245</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=85245</link><author>mdelarosab</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>IE7 Beta Zoom Feature</title><description>On previous versions I used to press Ctrl and move the Wheel to increase and decrease the font size.
On IE7 this has been replaced with the zoom feature, which is great, but now I have the problem that the righ border of the page goes out of the window.
It would be great to have something like a Pan funtion or something like that to move the page around.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 1 workaround, 1 comment, feedback id: 85245</description><a10:updated>2006-11-09T18:37:58-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85246</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=85246</link><author>mdelarosab</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>IE7 Beta Customize Keyboard Shortcuts</title><description>It would be great to be able to customize Keyboard Shortcuts on the command toolbar as in Office.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 85246</description><a10:updated>2006-11-09T18:37:54-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85275</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=85275</link><author>Reinar</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Citrix Client</title><description>Hi,
I just installed the ie7 beta 2 sp2 with success. Interface looking good and simple. 

I am highly dependant on Citrix, and after installation of ie7 I had to re-install the existing newest version of the Citrix client. 

It chose firstly to use Java, but after installating the Citrix client again and then the supplier Certificate, restarting the ie7 - then things were back to normal.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 85275</description><a10:updated>2007-01-31T09:57:17-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85832</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=85832</link><author>eatrottenbananas</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Busy indicator for the Full screen mode of Internet Explorer 7</title><description>When in full screen mode, internet explorer should give an indicator that there is activity when clicking on a link for example.  This is useful for slower connections where clicking on a link might have a delay before the screen updates.  The chasing circle in the tab is the indicator for a non full screen mode.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 2 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 85832</description><a10:updated>2006-11-09T18:37:51-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85833</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=85833</link><author>eatrottenbananas</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Busy indicator for the Full screen mode of Internet Explorer 7</title><description>When in full screen mode, internet explorer should give an indicator that there is activity when clicking on a link for example.  This is useful for slower connections where clicking on a link might have a delay before the screen updates.  The chasing circle in the tab is the indicator for a non full screen mode.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 85833</description><a10:updated>2006-11-09T18:37:48-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">85984</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=85984</link><author>andrewlee</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>LSP categorization</title><description>The "Best Practices for Layered Service Provider (LSP) Development in Windows" document from the Windows Network Developer Platform downloads area discusses LSP categorization which is being introduced into Windows Vista.  This scheme is to be welcomed as a means of excluding non-essential LSPs from being loaded into system critical processes, but for general applcation categorization I think the set of LSP types are too narrow.

I am a developer involved in the design and implementation of an...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 85984</description><a10:updated>2006-08-15T12:39:41-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">87450</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=87450</link><author>YellowWing</author><category>Bug</category><title>LSP based on Feb 06 sample nonIFS LSP causes the DNS Client to use 100% of CPU on Vista Beta 2</title><description>I have an LSP that I have created using the nonIFS LSP sample from Feb 06. The LSP works fine on these operating systems that I have tested.

Windows 2000 Professional SP4
Windows 2000 Server SP4
Windows XP Home SP2
Windows XP Professional SP1
Windows XP Professional SP2
Windows XP Media Center Edition SP2
Windows 2003 Server SP1
Windows 2003 Server R2
Windows Vista February CTP

Has something changed with Windows Vista Beta 2 that requires changes to the nonIFS LSP sample? A build o...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 87450</description><a10:updated>2006-07-07T14:46:06-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">87458</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=87458</link><author>YellowWing</author><category>Bug</category><title>DNS Client service not using a unique command line signature in Vista</title><description>With the advent of Windows Vista, many more services are using the same command line signature and user id. How is an LSP suppossed to pick out the DNS Client service from all of the services with the same command line and user id?

I have an LSP that needs to monitor the DNS Client, but none of the other services on the machine, how can the LSP figure out which service is calling WSPStartup if the information available to the LSP is not unique for the DNS Client?

&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 87458</description><a10:updated>2006-07-07T14:53:36-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">128070</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=128070</link><author>VPK</author><category>Bug</category><title>FormatMessage does not work with IE7 Beta 2 WinInet.DLL</title><description>After installing of IE7 Beta 2 a message text for Internet API error codes (INTERNET_ERROR_BASE+xx) is not available anymore. The reason is that the WinInet.DLL MUI resource-only DLL (%WINDIR%\System32\en-US\WinInet.dll.mui) contains 2 MESSAGETABLEs, and the 2nd one has desired messages, but they cannot be obtained by FormatMessage API.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 128070</description><a10:updated>2008-02-08T12:16:12-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">133241</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=133241</link><author>BillyA</author><category>Bug</category><title>WinINet hangs when dealing with some implementations of chunked-encoding servers</title><description>Please see this post for a description of the behavior
http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2006/06/microsoft_pleas.html&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 133241</description><a10:updated>2008-02-08T12:16:17-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">134039</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=134039</link><author>Razorback2</author><category>Bug</category><title>IE7 BETA 2 Bug with Layer restrictions</title><description>I know, that this not might fit in here,
but since other available ressources were unavailable, I have chosen to post it here.

The new IE72 is uncapable of dealing with a layer in the navigation page www.uni-dortmund.de:

I assume, the error code is located in a wrong interpretation of the following code:

openpopup()
&lt;/script&gt;
--&gt;

&lt;!-- &lt;scrmit_zwei_bildernipt language="JavaScript1.2" src="navigation/dhtmllib.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;script language="JavaScript1.2" src="navigation/popupmenu....&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 5 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 6 validations, 2 workarounds, 10 comments, feedback id: 134039</description><a10:updated>2007-07-29T21:01:28-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">152288</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=152288</link><author>Adam2006</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Sort of Organised Temporary Tab Groups? for IE7</title><description>I like the idea of tab groups however I think the idea can be quite easily taken further. What I'd like to see is the ability to "activate" a tab group, so select a tab group from a dropdown in the toolbar or something. When the tab group is active, you're saying that you're browsing on a particular topic, say "New Computer" and you open and close a variety of hardware reviews etc and then when you're done and want to browse for something else you might activate a new tab group, or close the bro...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 152288</description><a10:updated>2006-11-09T18:37:10-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">153320</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=153320</link><author>mahara</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Windows Network Architecture for Proxy Authentication</title><description>Firstly, I want describe problems I encountered. Next after that, I’ll go straightforward to things I want to suggest. I can’t think to whom else I can submit this feedback so that, for now, I choose WNDP. I’m sorry if I’m taking a wrong direction.

I'm not sure on how Windows network platform is being architected to support proxy authentication, but for me it is simply bad — very bad indeed.

I'm currently connected to the Internet through a Squid proxy server (apparently not an ISA one). P...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 12 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 1 workaround, 3 comments, feedback id: 153320</description><a10:updated>2009-10-26T22:02:59-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">155706</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=155706</link><author>Bandora</author><category>Bug</category><title>Problem with iframes?</title><description>don't know if this is a bug or something.. but With Internet Explorer 6 I used to see everything in the Iframes in this website.. pipeline.wayne.edu.. but when I installed IE7 ,even back to Beta1 and beta2, it keeps telling me that this browser is not supported for Iframes...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 155706</description><a10:updated>2006-07-13T17:37:24-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">162416</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=162416</link><author>Plusflight</author><category>Bug</category><title>No Problem </title><description>No Problem &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 162416</description><a10:updated>2006-07-18T11:14:39-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">165195</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=165195</link><author>ian_barile</author><category>Bug</category><title>WinInet API from an impersonated thread context will result in an error</title><description>Currently with Vista Beta 2, using WinInet API from an impersonated thread context will result in an error.
According to MSDN, WinInet does not support thread impersonation.
Therefore, this might actually be the correct behavior.
 
Plan for future release:
Parse index.dat to bypass all WinInet API
 
Side note for 2K and XP:
WinInet does somewhat support impersonation on those platform.
WinInet will always runs within the user context in which it was loaded from.
Any impersonation after...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 165195</description><a10:updated>2006-08-08T16:35:01-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">165237</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=165237</link><author>chrone</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>cookies delete on exit</title><description>a feature which enable us to set automatic delete cookies on ie7 exit.

i think it's a good feature specially if we're in hurry and forget to log out but only close the application, hence the feature prevent other to see or use our account. perhaps it is important in public places such as cybercafe an so on.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 6 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 workarounds, 4 comments, feedback id: 165237</description><a10:updated>2009-05-06T10:53:08-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">167235</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=167235</link><author>yairs</author><category>Bug</category><title>sendto() and 10004 error code</title><description>Hello, 

I have a packet filtering firewall that blocks outgoing connection from 
my machine. 


I have an application that sends UDP packets. Apparently sendto() 
function fails with error code 10004 (A blocking operation was 
interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall). 


It happens both on WIN2KSP4 and WIN2K3SP1 machine (both with blocking and non-blocking sockets)


1. Why does sendto() return error code 10004 (I am not using blocking hooks at all)?
2. As far as I underst...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 5 comments, feedback id: 167235</description><a10:updated>2006-07-20T13:12:14-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">187863</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=187863</link><author>S-Andy</author><category>Bug</category><title>There is no SSL support in HTTP API or not enough documentation</title><description>Accordingly to the documentation to enable SSL developer should do two things:

1) He should register SSL certificate
2) He should register URLs specifying "https" scheme

I did not understand how HTTPAPI will knows that this ssl certificate belongs to this URL? As expected SSL does not work. So there is three possibilities:

1) SSL support is not yet realized in HTTPAPI
2) HTTPAPI has a bug (how does it know which certificate then?)
3) Documentation is very uncomplete

If I connect t...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 11 comments, feedback id: 187863</description><a10:updated>2006-08-30T03:44:11-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">191952</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=191952</link><author>jguo</author><category>Bug</category><title>Enumerate/delete cache content cannot work for IE7 on Vista RC1</title><description>OS: Vista RC1 with IE7 RC1.

FindFirstUrlCacheEntry, FindNextNextUrlCacheEntry and DeleteUrlCacheEntry can only work to enumerate/delete "Visited:" indices. They cannot work for other cache content. They can work well for IE7 RC1 on XP.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Tracking, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 191952</description><a10:updated>2006-10-29T17:31:45-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">192027</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=192027</link><author>Texas_Boy_JMR</author><category>Bug</category><title>Site I'm on can read my clipboard.</title><description>I don't know if this is a bug or not. I have a site that I visit that reads a number placed in my clipboard by the initiating embedded html address. I get a msg from IE7 that the site I am on can read my clipboard and asks me to allow or cancel. I click on allow and the msg returns again and again if I try to cancel the notice I get the same results. I can only get out by ending the task in the Task Manager and restarting IE7. On a different issue today 9/01/2006 I keep getting notices that Hotm...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 192027</description><a10:updated>2006-09-06T19:48:35-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">193831</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=193831</link><author>Sparkleware</author><category>Bug</category><title>InternetReadFile() continues to block after InternetCloseHandle() called</title><description>In a small percentage of HTTP download attempts, InternetReadFile() blocks longer than the timeout(s) specified by InternetSetOption() without receiving any data.  I have tried calling InternetCloseHandle() (from a second thread) on the handle used for HTTPSendRequest() (as suggested by KB article 176420), but it does not cause InternetReadFile() to return.

I have observed the problem in Wininet.dll v6.0.2800.1559 and previous versions, called from an application that runs simultaneous downlo...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 193831</description><a10:updated>2006-10-26T19:13:25-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">197999</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=197999</link><author>Jompa</author><category>Bug</category><title>WMP 11 beta does not work with IE7 RC1</title><description>I noticed when I installed IE7 RC1 that I can't open video/audio clips directly from internet. I have both tryed WMP 10 and WMP 11 beta. In IE7 beta 2 it works perfectly. It opens the link but then processor goes to 100% and WMP is jammed.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 197999</description><a10:updated>2006-10-26T19:13:27-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">210480</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=210480</link><author>Ga, Seok-Hyun</author><category>Bug</category><title>-</title><description>-&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 210480</description><a10:updated>2006-10-26T22:16:54-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">215463</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=215463</link><author>dick_zhang</author><category>Bug</category><title>For The Newer LSP Example, IE Crash Occasionally</title><description>I Download The Newer LSP Example From The WNDP index page, And i use visual studio 2005 to compile it and install it into my computer (winxp with sp2).

i using the sporder.exe to ensure the ifslsp install successfully, and the ifslsp work properly.

but after that, when i using some ie to explorer some website like http://www.phoenixtv.com 's index page , and click video button in the index page, IE ocure a exception and crash. i use the vs2005 debug it, but find nothing.
when i uninstall ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Tracking, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 215463</description><a10:updated>2006-10-26T11:19:20-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">224326</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=224326</link><author>jaqsaw-ols</author><category>Bug</category><title>InternetReadFile gets timeout error on Vista</title><description>We use WinInet to send HTTP request to and get response back from a webservice. The code works fine on Windows XP. However, it does not work on Vista. 

Our response is about 20KB. InternetReadFile read 8k each time. On Vista, it works sometimes. But not always.  Sometimes, after read the first or second 8kb of data, InternetReadFile will stay there for long time and them timeout error occur. I changed timeout vaule, but it does not work. 

I am using Vista RC build 5600. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 224326</description><a10:updated>2008-12-17T17:49:41-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">232953</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=232953</link><author>RichWeber</author><category>Bug</category><title>IE7 Final render Bug - form elements vanish</title><description>php/javascript form elements vanish in IE7 final. This does not happen in all other browsers, including ie6. Elements are rendered when page loads, but soon disappear. Resizing from the lower corners of IE7 brings these elements back for a short time.



&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 232953</description><a10:updated>2006-11-06T09:00:01-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">238193</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=238193</link><author>AnttiL.</author><category>Bug</category><title>InternetOpenUrl bug with scandinavian letters</title><description>I have a code in VB activeX control to get documents from webserver. This code 
uses InternetOpenUrl to get the document. Everything was working fine until 
IE7 and wininet 7.x. Now when ever I have letters like "ä" or "ö" in the URL, 
I get 401 not found. When I look from webservers logs I can see that 
scandinavian letters are totally missing when the call reaches the web 
server.  The call is as follows:
hOpenUrl = InternetOpenUrl(hInternetSession, sUrl, vbNullString, 0, 
INTERNET_FLAG...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 238193</description><a10:updated>2007-02-14T15:21:54-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">242020</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=242020</link><author>schin</author><category>Bug</category><title>IE7 wininet and DCOM application</title><description>We developed a Client/Server DCOM application from IE4.0, 
and work fine until IE6. 
When I test our application in IE7, it cannot work when access 
the HTTP server of outside by server application. 
The server application access the HTTP server of outside by Wininet. 
and I used MFC wininet class to make our program. 

The error symptoms is: 
When set lanuched user run the server application in dcomcnfg.exe, 
it work fine. 
But set runas this user which is a admin account, then it can...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Tracking, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 242020</description><a10:updated>2007-03-19T13:08:20-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">242964</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=242964</link><author>grangeway</author><category>Bug</category><title>HttpListener in dotnet Beginwrite Bug ?</title><description>I came across an interesting behaviour in a coding project. Two friends of mine have reproduced this issue, and it is there sample code that I describe/attach to illustrate the issue.

A System.Net.HttpListenerException with message "The parameter is incorrect" occurs if the size of a buffer being passed to HttpLIstenerResponse.OutputStream.BeginWrite is greated then 2041 bytes (I'm rather interested to know why 2041 and not 2048 or similar).

We believe this error is being generated by ms-h...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 242964</description><a10:updated>2007-03-14T16:58:15-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">244309</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=244309</link><author>Garnmcgaughn</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Windows Media Player- Skinless colours</title><description>I noticed how it now shows up black, and I just thought there should be a 'tint' ability like Windows Live Messanger has now.  A way to effect the visuality without changing the skin.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 244309</description><a10:updated>2007-01-30T16:37:30-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">245789</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=245789</link><author>BranimirG</author><category>Bug</category><title>Network stops working after using BitComet for more than 5-6 hrs</title><description>I've noticed that after using BitComet for a few hrs, the whole networking in Vista stops.
what's being currently active, stays active (for example I was using Skype when everything else stopped. Skype continued working - the connection stayed open).
I mean that it completely stops. I've reproduced it on RC2 &amp; RTM machines.

Shutting down the application won't help - once the networking stops, only a system restart can fix it.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 245789</description><a10:updated>2007-06-27T13:25:46-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">252941</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=252941</link><author>Amith</author><category>Bug</category><title>WinInet API Fails when IE 7.0 is Installed.</title><description>InternetOpen function fails if IE 7.0 is installed.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 1 workaround, 1 comment, feedback id: 252941</description><a10:updated>2007-06-27T13:25:48-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">257554</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=257554</link><author>DrChuck</author><category>Bug</category><title>Problem with CHttpFile::SendRequest() within CWinApp::InitInstance() with IE7 DLLs </title><description>
I have a DLL that was working fine until I switched to IE7.  Debugging through it, the code would hang at a call to CHttpFile::SendRequest() within CWinApp::InitInstance().  Removing the code and putting it in another function outside the initialization sequence solved the issue, but any insight into the problem would be greatly appreciated.

thanks, Chuck&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 257554</description><a10:updated>2007-06-27T13:25:51-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">263288</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=263288</link><author>bwin</author><category>Bug</category><title>Bug in Winsock 2 layered service provider (LSP) sample</title><description>In the ifslsp sample in spi.cpp in function WSPGetSockOpt (around line 415)
it reads:

if ( *optlen &lt;= sizeof( WSAPROTOCOL_INFOW ) )

should be:

if ( *optlen &lt; sizeof( WSAPROTOCOL_INFOW ) )

Same for the A - version.

Otherwise a caller with a buffer size of exact sizeof WSAPROTOCOL_INFOW will fail,
and will get sizeof( WSAPROTOCOL_INFOW ) as needed buffer size.
Outlook 2003 for example will not work!!!


&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 263288</description><a10:updated>2007-06-27T13:26:04-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">263514</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=263514</link><author>vijenderyadav</author><category>Bug</category><title>Fresh LSP install on windows 2000 machine, IE fails to work</title><description>I am using a LSP sample from a website Komodia that claims to fix bugs in the first LSP sample release. The LSP installs over TCP and UDP and works fine on W2K, XP and 2K3 .
My LSP gets installed when user visits my website. On user login, through an activeX the LSP is installed and user is redirected to a new page. 
The issue here is on Windows 2K where LSP is installed correctly but IE fails to redirect to user landing page. IE just hangs...this is the stack of the thread that is hing
ntosk...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Won't Fix, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 263514</description><a10:updated>2007-06-28T13:35:37-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">266227</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=266227</link><author>Ladislav Lang</author><category>Bug</category><title>Incorrect socket behavior on Windows Vista</title><description>Hello, 
I found serious problem with tcp sockets on Windows Vista,
primary it's wrong behavior and mabye it's also the security problem.

If you bind socket (application 1) to All addresses 0.0.0.0:12345
you can still bind application2 to another address 192.168.36.155 on the same port 12345.

Example:
PC has two IPs: 192.168.36.155 and 10.10.10.10, clients are connected from localhost
 
application 1: listen on 0.0.0.0 : 12345         .... prints "1"
application 2: listen on 192.168....&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 266227</description><a10:updated>2007-06-27T13:26:08-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">267998</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=267998</link><author>Tuomas Siren</author><category>Bug</category><title>Microsoft Windows Network Monitor 3.0.372.1: sparser.npl corrupted</title><description>[I couldn't find better place to report this bug, I hope this is acceptable.]

sparser.npl seems to be corrupted in the installation package, netmon complains at start "Encountered errors while loading 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft Network Monitor 3.0\npl\sparser. npl file."

I extracted the file in question from the msi and it's identical to one installed.

----
//#  ** Microsoft Public Parser **Pr//#  (c) 2006 Microsoft Corpora"ionsN//#Pr//#  Title:       SParser - Start 0" Parser (top-mo...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Resolved, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 267998</description><a10:updated>2007-06-27T13:32:32-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">269361</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=269361</link><author>Farhan Kazi</author><category>Bug</category><title>DNS does not resolve external queries with ISA Server 2000</title><description>I am running Windows 2003 Server (Standard Edition / with SP2 / No AD) with ISA Server 2000 (with packet filter disabled). 
I have two interface cards installed in this server, one is connected to my internal network (10.0.0.1) and second one is connected with my ISP (dynamic IP).

I have configured DNS forwarders with my ISP DNS and have also deleted "." zone from forward lookup zones.

Now the problem is; whenever I perform nslookup I get following error.

C:\&gt;nslookup www.yahoo.com
Se...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 269361</description><a10:updated>2007-04-08T12:32:22-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">271061</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=271061</link><author>icnintel</author><category>Bug</category><title>XP/Vista home network: Insecure IP address access and computer name mangling</title><description>I would like to bring to your attention two bugs I have uncovered with either/both Windows XP SP2 and Windows Vista Home Premium. The problem relates to file sharing and general networking between the two operating systems.

I have the following setup:

- HP Compaq nx7000 running Windows XP SP2, Computer Name: MDTHE4TH, Workgroup: THE_SD
- HP Pavilion dv6253 running Windows Vista Home Premium, Computer Name: MDTHE5TH, Workgroup: THE_SD

Both of these are connected via Ethernet CAT5 cables...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Resolved, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 271061</description><a10:updated>2007-08-12T21:42:54-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">274778</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=274778</link><author>noeld</author><category>Bug</category><title>FtpCommand crashes when passed a RETR command and a return handle (IE7)</title><description>I am trying to implement a resume feature in a FTP application but when I call FtpCommand with the RETR command, the debugger breaks in and displays the following message:

"Unhandled exception at 0x77c42a16 in ftpcmd.exe: 0xC0000005: Access 
violation reading location 0x00000001."

Here is a sample code:

    HINTERNET hResponse = NULL; 
    BOOL bRet = FtpCommand(hConnection, 
                           TRUE, FTP_TRANSFER_TYPE_BINARY,
                           "RETR /404.html",  0, ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Resolved, Resolution: Fixed, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 2 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 274778</description><a10:updated>2007-11-13T00:21:10-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">274870</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=274870</link><author>Grober</author><category>Bug</category><title>closesocket() lets pending overlapped WSARecv fail with ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED instead of WSA_OPERATION_ABORTED</title><description>closesocket() is documented to let pending overlapped socket i/o operations fail with WSA_OPERATION_ABORTED, but in my tests an overlapped WSARecv fails with ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED when closing the socket.

When GetOverlappedResult returns the 'Internal' member of the OVERLAPPED structure is STATUS_LOCAL_DISCONNECT (see ntstatus.h) which is mapped to ERROR_NETNAME_DELETED.

When I call CancelIo instead of closesocket I get the expected ERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED / WSA_OPERATION_ABORTED.

I did...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 274870</description><a10:updated>2007-06-13T13:45:22-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">277434</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=277434</link><author>eleigh</author><category>Bug</category><title>Local Area Connection missing after logging into Vista too quickly</title><description>If I log into Vista (Ultimate, 32 bit) as soon as the log-in dialog appears, without fail Vista fails to correctly initialize the LAN adapter (nForce 550 with driver v65.5.5.0). If I wait 15 seconds or so before logging into Vista, all is well.

Though the Device Manager reports that the adapter is present and 'working correctly', the 'Network and Sharing Center' reports that the nVidia nForce Network Controller is experiencing 'a hardware or driver related problem'.

If I run 'ipconfig /all...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 3 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 277434</description><a10:updated>2007-12-20T14:53:02-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283276</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283276</link><author>pfelsted</author><category>Bug</category><title>winhttp object not getting reinitialzed properly</title><description>We have an application that sends http directly to a site using winhttp.  All of a sudden last week the program stopped working.  This had been working for almost 2 years with no trouble.  We are not sure what started the trouble since our code and winhttp have not changed (we are using winhttp.dll 5.1).  I suspect that the system we are accessing added a new server to their cluster(nlb) and this is what caused the trouble.

When we access the site and login and perform actions within the init...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 1 comment, feedback id: 283276</description><a10:updated>2007-06-20T17:44:40-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">284290</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WNDP/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=284290</link><author>Cosmin2</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Review for "InternetSetOption does not set timeout values"</title><description>Hello.

I would like to get an update on the issue described in Q176420 (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/176420); the "applies to" section does not mention IE 7, however I was not able to modify the timeout for any operation with the WinInet.dll version I have - 7.0.6000.16473.

Just for reference, I was trying to set the following:

DWORD var = 4000L; // millisec

int b = InternetSetOption(fSession, INTERNET_OPTION_CONNECT_TIMEOUT, 
(void *)&amp;var, sizeof(var)); 

b = Inte...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Tracking, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 284290</description><a10:updated>2008-04-14T18:02:30-07:00</a10:updated></item></channel></rss>