﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - Windows Server 2008 Feedback</title><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/default.aspx</link><description>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - Windows Server 2008 Feedback</description><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;#169; 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:30:16 -0800</lastBuildDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283199</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283199</link><author>Dave Britt</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>DNS Snap-in Remote to Core Server</title><description>Having installed a Core Server as a RODC and DNS Server, command line tools confirm that the DNS configuration has been successful and that zone information is available. When connecting from the DNS Snap-in on a remote Windows Server 2008 machine it reports a "Security package" error and only allows you to see the log information and no zone information&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 283199</description><a10:updated>2007-06-23T04:31:55-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283247</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283247</link><author>NThornhill</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>WDS functionality and documentation suggestions</title><description>The following issues have arisen during testing of WDS:
(A) There is no real explanation of how to insert the WDS binaries into a WinPE image, in order to create a deployment boot image. WDS documentation explains that it is possible to use the boot.wim from the W2008 DVD but this image is not heavily customizable (in addition, I've had problems inserting network drivers into boot.wim - I have written this issue up on the W2008 technet forums). There is no documented way to create a customized ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 283247</description><a10:updated>2007-06-18T04:31:07-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283254</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283254</link><author>Sepp</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Backup bug</title><description>Basic clean install of 2008x64 on HP DL380G4 with Raid 1 (2x37GB) SCSI &amp; RAID 5 (3x147GB) SCSI. Backup drive Raid 1 USB (2x250GB) SATA.
1st backup works fine, next one fails. Reason "Missing volume" left behind on Server Volume table. remove manually "missing volume" and next backup works fine.
tested 16 times, different configurations, all options in backup, same result.
Keep testing until......BTW server2008 runs Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 (x64), on top SBS2003R2, Server 2003 R2 as webserve...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 283254</description><a10:updated>2007-06-20T12:14:19-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283305</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283305</link><author>carlostavaresjr</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>PRODUCT ACTIVATION ERROR AFTER CLEAN INSTALL (Beta 3 Build 6.0.6001.16510.070417 x86 version)</title><description>I will describe the following issue about the FRESH INSTALL (Clean Install) of Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 (still code-named "Longhorn") - 32bit release - Build 6.0.6001.16510.070417:

- Fresh install of Windows Server 2008 (Standard Server) leads the following message at the end of process: "Your Product Key Has Been Expirated - Must Activate Now" - same as XP versions with Illegal Product Keys;
- At the botton of screen that shows (Microsoft Windows Server Code Name "Longhorn" Build 6001) - the...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 283305</description><a10:updated>2007-12-22T10:02:52-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283574</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283574</link><author>Carl Dietrich</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Test of build and milestone transfer to WinOS</title><description>Test&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 283574</description><a10:updated>2008-04-10T13:25:34-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283584</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283584</link><author>SteelCity1981</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Windows Server 2008 Logon error</title><description>Everytime I try to logon to a diff account i get a logon error saying it's not a valid user.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 283584</description><a10:updated>2008-04-10T13:25:34-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">283951</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=283951</link><author>hansmeier</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>RODC "TGT_nnnn"-User-Account: Description should include Name of RODC</title><description>If you install an RODC, an associated TGT Account is automatically created. The description gives basic information about the use of the account. Neither from the name nor from the description it is possible to tell for which RODC the TGT User-Account was created.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 283951</description><a10:updated>2007-06-23T04:43:24-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">285205</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=285205</link><author>barker</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Logoff when using Terminal Services</title><description>In previous versions of Windows Server, when you were connected via Terminal Services, the ability to logoff or disconnect from your terminal session was predominantly displayed in the start menu.  In Windows Server 2008, the user friendly location of these options (in the bottom right corner of the start menu) has been replaced by the Power Off and Lock Workstation options.  To logoff you have to expand the additional options choice next to Lock and then select Logoff.  While you may be strivin...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Tracking, 22 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 2 workarounds, 5 comments, feedback id: 285205</description><a10:updated>2009-06-03T07:25:39-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">285699</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=285699</link><author>robinsob</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>SharePoint BPA fails to perform analysis on virtual Win 2008 June CTP Server</title><description>Microsoft Best Practices Analyzer for Microsoft Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 and the 2007 Microsoft Office System
Run Date: July 1, 2007 13:14:45

Errors (1)


Error Details
Title: The SharePoint 3.0 Central Administration Web application account and the Windows SharePoint Services Timer Service account must be the same 
Severity: 1 
Description:
The same account that you use to run SharePoint 3.0 Central Administration must be configured as the SharePoint Timer Service. If they are...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 285699</description><a10:updated>2007-07-05T08:37:59-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">285980</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=285980</link><author>Cyro_BOVESPA</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Application Center 2000 Features</title><description>The following management features are included in the Application Center 2000, and they are not available in Windows Server 2008.

a) Web Pages virtual addresses management
A single tool integrated with IIS which can define Virtual IP Addresses settings for the whole web farm.

b) Web content replication for Web Farms
Web content replication. In Application Center 2000, there is a "master server" which replicates its content to the other servers. Also, in this feature, you can choose what ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 6 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 285980</description><a10:updated>2007-08-10T21:31:55-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">286232</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=286232</link><author>Ascarib</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Microsoft games</title><description>You should to add to this Windows some "Microsoft games", for example "FreeCell".&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 3 Up-Votes, 3 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 286232</description><a10:updated>2008-04-28T20:43:29-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">286608</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=286608</link><author>glstewart</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Upgrade blocked but SharePoint Services not installed</title><description>Longhorn Setup says Windows SharePoint Services is installed, but it isn't installed according to Add/Remove Windows Components. Unable to upgrade from Windows Server 2003 R2 Std Ed SP2 to June CTP.

You must make the following changes before upgrading Windows

      Uninstall the following programs: 

          o Windows SharePoint Services
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 286608</description><a10:updated>2007-07-26T15:41:17-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">286637</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=286637</link><author>MaKu</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>wins mgmt snap in</title><description>You are not able to make a new statis mapping with the important [1Bh] entry.
This entry is used to search for the pdc of a domain.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 286637</description><a10:updated>2007-07-09T22:58:57-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">286638</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=286638</link><author>tikeda</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>BD記録再生とHD DVD再生機能を持つドライブアイコンの変更要求の件</title><description>BD記録再生とHD DVD再生機能を持つドライブのアイコンは現状HD DVD-ROMのアイコンが表示される。BD記録が主要な機能であるためドライブアイコンは以下のように変更していただきたい。
１．BD / HD DVD-ROM の Dual 機能を示すアイコン表示とする。
（BDとHDの再生機能のみの場合も同様とする)
上記 Dual 表示が無理な場合には
２．BD ドライブを示すアイコン表示とする。

&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 286638</description><a10:updated>2007-07-25T13:34:22-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">286670</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=286670</link><author>VachtiCZ</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Server Applications</title><description>Can I try using some older server applications such as ISA Server 2006 with this new server. Or is possible simulate Windows server 2003 ?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 286670</description><a10:updated>2007-07-10T06:15:57-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">286907</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=286907</link><author>kennymusicman</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>NAT set-up demonstration/guide for typical usage scenarios on ipv6 and ipv4</title><description>With the increasing adoption of ipv6 it would be useful to have a simple graphical demo on setting up NAT - setting up on ipv4 is fine - but some of us are not experienced with the newer framework and potentially implement features incorrectly.  Simple typical scenarios would be beneficial (say, a single NAT for a single domain).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 1 Down-Vote, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 286907</description><a10:updated>2009-07-07T04:21:59-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">286957</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=286957</link><author>acicomp</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Wireless anablement</title><description>My suggestion is to enable wirless server service out of the box. While many networks are allowing and enableing wireless services, a easy service to have turned on out of the box would be wireless service. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 286957</description><a10:updated>2009-07-07T04:19:22-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">287187</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=287187</link><author>DCDugger</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Insecure passwords, seemengly no minimum security.</title><description>I've been playing with Server 2008 Build 6001 and I set a secure password for the administator account. My Wife, who likes to mess with what I'm doing decided to change it to an 'easier password to remember' it was a simple dictionary word that a brutforce attack could crack pretty easily. 



&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 7 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 2 workarounds, 4 comments, feedback id: 287187</description><a10:updated>2009-05-08T13:16:41-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">287748</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=287748</link><author>DCDugger</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Multiple Mobile Devices</title><description>I have an older Dell Axim X5 and a newer T-Mobile MDA. I would like to be able to sync both of them with the server and utilize the Axim as a 'backup' if you will. I don't use it much anymore but I paid for that darn thing and I'm going to use it as long as I can.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 287748</description><a10:updated>2007-07-16T16:51:04-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288029</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288029</link><author>tikeda</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Drive icon change request regarding the drive with BD rewritable and HD DVD read function</title><description>Regarding the drive with the BD rewitable and the HD DVD read function, current state HD DVD-ROM icon is displayed. 
BD rewritable is a key function, so I would like you to change as follows. 
1. The icon shows the Dual function of BD/HD DVD-ROM drive. 
(Including the drive of BD read and HD DVD-ROM read function.)
If above-mentioned Dual display is impossible
2. The icon shows only function of BD drive. 
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 288029</description><a10:updated>2008-07-18T10:42:05-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288267</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288267</link><author>HikmatSalim</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Partial Restore\restore of Server data configuration </title><description>The ability to perform restore of specific set server configuration upon system disaster recovery. by creating a new  backup/restore system that have the ability to backup only selected parts of system configuration information such as ,forest / Domain configuration portions ,  Users account and SID , computers accounts &amp; SID , web server configuration , DNS server configuration , hardware configuration information , Exchange configuration , SQL configuration &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 4 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 288267</description><a10:updated>2009-03-11T01:33:38-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288496</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288496</link><author>sbrickey</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Application Hibernation</title><description>Just as windows is able to hybernate, why not allow per-application hybernation?... this would be more for consumer/workstation/laptop users than for server applications (or perhaps not)... perhaps services?

this would be a cool utility to write if not for the obvious security layers w/in the OS... therefore, I leave it in your capable hands.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 288496</description><a10:updated>2007-07-20T21:51:39-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288539</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288539</link><author>carlostavaresjr</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>"Manage Server" UI hides some informations (june ctp)</title><description>When dialog window "Manage Server" is finaly loaded, the text about "computer" (1st field at right side of dialog) looses its format, such as: 

"comput- 
  er"           (this way, breaked down in two lines)&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 288539</description><a10:updated>2007-07-23T13:49:41-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288544</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288544</link><author>carlostavaresjr</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Volume levels is show as "muted" when it not is  (june ctp)</title><description>When the Sound Mixer is launched by "Playback Devices" and main Speaker System (from sound card) configuration by "Levels" dialog always will show all the sound card resources (such as "CD, Line In, Auxiliary,...") as muted except the Main Volume. Additional effects: Some balance levels at first configuration will be: left @50% and right @43%.

** This issue occours only at June CTP release (Build 6001.16606);
** This issue does not occour running Beta 3 (Build 6001.16510);
** Hardware: Dual Pro...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 288544</description><a10:updated>2007-07-23T13:49:42-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288642</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288642</link><author>nhzhmsol.bokee.com</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>反馈</title><description>运行某些能在Vista下正常运行的程序出现兼容问题&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 288642</description><a10:updated>2007-07-23T13:49:43-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288643</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288643</link><author>nhzhmsol.bokee.com</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>反馈</title><description>运行某些Vista下能正常运行的程序遇到兼容性问题&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 288643</description><a10:updated>2007-07-23T13:49:42-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288657</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288657</link><author>L1nk3d1n</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>dcpromo unattended</title><description>When trying to dcpromo a Server 2008 core installation, you are forced to use the unattended dcpromo option. I have not been able to find any support tools for generating such an unattended file, the setupmgr.exe in deplaoy.cab (Server 2003) only gives options for the Server installation and does not provide any options for an unattend file for dcpromo. Manually creating an unattend file does not prove very easy. There are many conflicts while trying the sample unattend file on technet.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 288657</description><a10:updated>2007-07-23T02:58:29-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">288922</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=288922</link><author>ewentms</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Server switched print ty[e to Symbols</title><description>Started up server and the print type was changed to Symbols&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 288922</description><a10:updated>2007-07-25T09:43:48-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">289093</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=289093</link><author>byonie</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Cann't install Vista on EFI BIOS</title><description>Hello,thank you for your attention firstly.We are a company which is dedicated to EFI BIOS development.Now we meet a problem on Vista installation(both Windows xp and DOS are OK).For detail,first we installed our EFI bios flash rom(with CSM module).Secondly, we choose boot from dvd option to install Vista.After we press any key as requested,there will soon jump out 2 sentences on the screen:"No physical memory is available at the location required for the windows boot manager.the system can not ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 289093</description><a10:updated>2007-07-27T13:23:21-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">289285</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=289285</link><author>Oliver Sommer</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>In German Beta3: "Zuverlässigkeits- und Leistungsüberwachung" the Harddriveperformance is measured in misunderstandingly translated "...% Meiste aktive Zeit"</title><description>In the german Beta 3 version there a translation or somthing bug in the performance report "Zuverlässigkeits und Leistungsüberwachung" where you can measure the Harddrives Performance and Percentage of active-Time the HDD uses:
It's named "..% Meiste aktive Zeit" and should IMHO be somehing like "...% der maximalen Datenträgerzeit" or even better "...% Datenträgerauslastung"&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 289285</description><a10:updated>2007-07-27T07:11:47-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">289784</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=289784</link><author>yao qiu</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>can not install virtual server 2005R2</title><description>After installing Windows server 2008 beta, I tried to install virtual server 2005R2 and it did not work. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 289784</description><a10:updated>2008-04-10T13:58:54-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">289861</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=289861</link><author>Jr. Hercules</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Not able to install the Active Directory Domain Controller role </title><description>Using build wsl_6001.16510.070417-1740_x86fre_server-KB3SFRE_EN_DVD.iso i am not able to install the Active Directory Domain Controller role, I get the following error message

Active Directory Domain Services: Installation failed


 &lt;Error&gt;: Attempt to install Active Directory Domain Controller failed with error code -2147023293. Fatal error during installation 

 The following role services were not installed: 

 Active Directory Domain Controller 
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 289861</description><a10:updated>2007-08-01T12:31:54-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">290050</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=290050</link><author>GurliGebis</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Windows Server Update Services Role</title><description>It would be nice if there was a Windows Server Update Services role to add, so you don't have to download and install WSUS manually.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 1 workaround, 1 comment, feedback id: 290050</description><a10:updated>2009-11-13T05:27:37-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">290189</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=290189</link><author>WritheM</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Rearrange open programs on the taskbar</title><description>I know its not a big issue for a server OS, more so a client OS. But this is the best outlet i currently have. 

One thing that ive noticed over the years here at work is that people are frustrated when an application has an error and is forced to close. Not so much because they have lost their data, but because they get used to the program being in a specific location on their taskbar. 
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 12 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 7 comments, feedback id: 290189</description><a10:updated>2009-03-09T23:15:14-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">290442</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=290442</link><author>KurtRoggen</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>AuditPol.exe</title><description>Allow AuditPol.exe to remotely get/set audit policies as it did before in Windows NT/2000.
If not it makes managing and troubleshooting audit policies (categories, but surely subcategories) very difficult.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 290442</description><a10:updated>2008-09-16T14:25:03-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">290752</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=290752</link><author>NThornhill</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Allow insertion of WDS captured images into W2008 DVD</title><description>I am considering a scenario using WDS images for W2008 server rollout, but there are scenarios in which some servers don't have access to PXE-boot. In that case, the optimal solution would be to build a replacement W2008 DVD containing the latest install.wim image from WDS, including all relevant drivers and patches. This DVD could be updated monthly and distributed in ISO form.

Reading imagex documentation:
"/flags "EditionID"
Specifies the version of Windows you are about to capture. The ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 290752</description><a10:updated>2007-08-03T05:56:09-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">290984</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=290984</link><author>fsdfs</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Support for more Routing Protocol</title><description>Windows 2008 seems to have removed OSPF support but more importantly BGP should be a supported protocol.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 290984</description><a10:updated>2008-05-01T08:51:48-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">291899</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=291899</link><author>BrianYdj</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>DS Auditing - DS Changes should include object deletions</title><description>Submitting a DCR for Windows Server 2008 to change the behavior of the security auditing subcategory Directory Service Changes.  We request that the Directory Service Changes subcategory record Directory Service (DS) object *deletions* in addition to changes in object values.  Currently, we have Success and Failure auditing enabled for the auditing category Directory Service Access in order to track object deletions, such as the deletion of an OU.  The effect of having Directory Service Access e...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 291899</description><a10:updated>2007-08-08T13:26:36-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">292149</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=292149</link><author>BrianYdj</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Group Policy Object Best Practices Analyzer</title><description>This is not for W2K8, but for Group Policy Object Best Practices Analyzer, which is part of the W2K8 TAP program.

We don't agree with some of the things it reports as Criticial issues, such as Group Policies not having their default names (e.g. Default Domain Policy being renamed) and policy settings it flags as Dangerous (e.g. security settings that financial service companies have enabled), etc. 

We believe the tool needs more exposure to large and complex environments to gain a better u...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 292149</description><a10:updated>2007-08-09T07:59:27-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">292713</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=292713</link><author>zeromus1</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>network activity icons no good</title><description>I need the old network activity icons and animations. I need to be able to see network activity for individual connections so I can monitor which connections are in use. The activity animation doesnt seem accurate.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 292713</description><a10:updated>2007-08-11T17:38:16-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">292731</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=292731</link><author>Software security</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Download Windows Server 2008 by Microsoft File Transfer Manager</title><description>Many user want to download windows server 2008 by internet and proble is that its take long time and if they disconnect then they must download it again.
My suggest is that you put Microsoft Windows Server 2008 that can download by Microsoft FTM so if we disconnect then we can continue download later.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: Not Reproducible, 21 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 workarounds, 7 comments, feedback id: 292731</description><a10:updated>2008-07-05T23:53:34-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">292990</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=292990</link><author>Ludovik.DOPIERALA</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>DNS behind NAT</title><description>When we use a DNS Server as a secondary server for a zone and the primary is a DNS bind with Xfer, we can't transfert the zone because the server send the private IP Adress IP in the request. Can you add a parameter to put the IP piblic for the xfer when we are secondary for a public DNS zone&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 292990</description><a10:updated>2007-08-13T07:18:00-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">293384</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=293384</link><author>sbrickey</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>remote machine service dependency</title><description>As machines are becoming further and further isolated, limiting service dependencies to local machine services starts to present limitations which force further administrator / manual involvement.

I would like some option for "remote dependencies" or similar, where a MACHINEA\ExchangeIS might be dependent on MACHINEB\ActiveDirectory.
There might be need for some "waiting for dependencies" stage/phase if a remote computer is booting or such.

Ideally it'd be possible to define such dependen...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 293384</description><a10:updated>2007-08-15T06:52:03-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">293643</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=293643</link><author>Rheal</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Feedback (Bug!) from Windows 2008 Core</title><description>When I first come to the Windows Server 2008 page on Connect, it says in big, bold, red letters - something to the effect of: Please submit all bugs by clicking the "How to Share Feedback" icon on your desktop and follow the process.

However - on Windows Server 2008 Core, which I have just installed... There is no such icon on the desktop. (of course? - since there are NO icons...)

I'm installing the "Full" version on a second VM just to submit a bug!  :(

At the very least - it should be a do...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 293643</description><a10:updated>2007-12-18T13:44:50-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">293806</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=293806</link><author>klar</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Windows Server Backup Messagebox Wording</title><description>When specifying a location type and NOT having a non-critical volume to put the backup on, the messagebox wording needs to be grammar-checked.  The last line states "Exclude the this volume from list of volumes to backup or add another disk and retry."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 293806</description><a10:updated>2007-08-17T09:27:18-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">293810</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=293810</link><author>klar</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>AD Sites and Services, Site Link Properties</title><description>When a site link is modified (cost or interval) and the changes are applied, the "Sites in this site link" window changes to list all of the contained sites twice.  It seems that AD just duplicated all of the sites, but after closing and re-opening the window, everything appears correctly.  This is confusing when configuring these properties.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: External, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 293810</description><a10:updated>2007-08-17T09:27:18-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">293818</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=293818</link><author>sbrickey</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>Windows Update "stop reminding" option</title><description>I just got back from lunch to find my computer had rebooted due to a Windows Update... This would be considered normal operation except I'd already told it to "remind LATER" to avoid rebooting, and was in the middle of burning a CD...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 293818</description><a10:updated>2007-08-26T15:28:09-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">294405</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=294405</link><author>The Source</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>IIS GUI for multiple SSL website with single IP</title><description>Currently IIS6 has the capabilities to host multiple SSL websites with one IP but it can't be done with the GUI. Add this feature to IIS7 so administrators can add SSL host headers from IIS GUI.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 294405</description><a10:updated>2009-05-08T12:28:07-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">295241</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=295241</link><author>Charles R.</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>[NPS] User dial-in properties</title><description>When you want to create a new network policy in NPS, you can see in the window "Specify Access Permission" three different options : 

- Access granted
-Access Denied

and Access is determined by User Dial-in properties (wich override NPS policy)

I don't want to determine acces by User Dial-in properties so I don't check the Box.

But at the final Window : "Completing New Network Policy" I can read in the different options : Ignore User Dial-in Properties : FALSE.
I think it should be...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 workaround, 0 comments, feedback id: 295241</description><a10:updated>2007-08-27T04:40:26-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">295370</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/WindowsServerFeedback/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=295370</link><author>KaMoL SaGwAn</author><category>Suggestion</category><title>RMS Service Account</title><description>Hello,
I only finished installed Active Directory Rights Management Server role, and was quite puzzled when I encountered the screen to add a RMS Service Account. This requirement is similar to RMS 1.0 SP2 available for W2k3, where you are required to create an domain user account and RMS assigns the account as a service account. In LongHorn though I was required to add the user also to the administrators group besides the domain users to get past the installation ..... 
Not sure if it's a bug...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Closed, Resolution: By Design, 0 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 workaround, 1 comment, feedback id: 295370</description><a10:updated>2008-04-10T13:58:55-07:00</a10:updated></item></channel></rss>