﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - BizTalk</title><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/Feedback</link><description>Microsoft Connect: Most Recent Feedback - BizTalk</description><language>en</language><copyright>&amp;#169; 2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:30:49 -0700</lastBuildDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><guid isPermaLink="false">785966</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/785966/esb-toolkit-2-2-error-in-using-the-dynamic-itinerary-resolver-bri</link><author>.Chris.Net</author><category>Bug</category><title>ESB Toolkit 2.2: Error in using the dynamic itinerary resolver (BRI)</title><description>
Product:
ESB Toolkit 2.2 with BizTalk Server 2013 

Environment:
Windows Server 2012

Issue:
Dynamic itinerary selection using the ESB pipeline 'ItinerarySelectReceiveXML' and the Business Rules Engine does not work (i.e. using the ESB Resolver BRI). It is not possible to dynamically apply an itinerary on a receive port. Only static literary selection appears to work.


Further confirmation of the issue logged in this MSDN forum thread:

http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/biztalkesb/...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 11 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 0 comments, feedback id: 785966</description><a10:updated>2013-04-30T19:11:46-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">785376</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/785376/esb-itinerary-wcf-services-which-hosted-in-iis-are-not-working-in-biztalk-2013</link><author>Sankar Muthusamy</author><category>Bug</category><title>ESB itinerary WCF services which hosted in IIS are not working in BizTalk 2013</title><description>
Server Error in '/ESB.ItineraryServices.Response.WCF' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.BizTalk.Interop.SSOClient, Version=7.0.2300.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. 
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more infor...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 1 workaround, 1 comment, feedback id: 785376</description><a10:updated>2013-04-23T04:13:50-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">785199</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/785199/biztalk-2013-rtm-and-esb-toolkit-2-2-unable-to-browse-non-generic-wcf-itinerary-service-on-windows-8-pro-with-net-framework-4-5</link><author>VikasBhardwaj</author><category>Bug</category><title>BizTalk 2013 RTM and ESB Toolkit 2.2 Unable to browse Non Generic WCF Itinerary Service on Windows 8 Pro with .Net Framework 4.5</title><description>I installed and configured BizTalk 2013 RTM and then ESB toolkit 2.2 on my laptop with Window 8 Pro and .Net Framework 4.5. Everything went smoothly, however when I try to browse http://localhost/ESB.ItineraryServices.WCF/ProcessItinerary.Svc in IE, it gives me an error as show below:


An ExceptionDetail, likely created by IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults=true, whose value is:
System.ArgumentException: The value could not be added to the collection, as the collection already contains an item of t...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 4 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 785199</description><a10:updated>2013-04-20T16:20:18-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">783388</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/783388/orchestrations-cannot-rehydrate-when-they-contain-a-message-with-a-diffgram-schema</link><author>Tough Rater</author><category>Bug</category><title>Orchestrations cannot rehydrate when they contain a message with a diffgram schema</title><description>I ran into a bug where Orchestrations throw an XLANG error as soon as the orchestration is being rehydrated (e.g., after receiving a message) if and only if the orchestration's current scope contains a message with a diffgram schema. It doesn't matter what the contents of the message are, BizTalk will just throw an error pointing at a dupplicate diffgram:0 name.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 1 workaround, 0 comments, feedback id: 783388</description><a10:updated>2013-04-10T11:35:45-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">783196</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/783196/bug-in-equal-functoid-comparing-strings-with-e</link><author>Vivekanandh007</author><category>Bug</category><title>Bug in Equal functoid - comparing strings with "E-"</title><description>An application which was running well in production started to fail after few months, while anayzing the problem, it seems to be issue with the logical equal to fuctoid, this is very basic thing, I dont know how much it is going to impact in whole application. It is comparing two strings say "05070E-599" and "05453E-599" and returning true, while digging into the fuctoid code, it treats this as number (E- is treated as scientific notation) and some how it returns true, this makes the application...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 0 comments, feedback id: 783196</description><a10:updated>2013-04-08T04:44:38-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">783103</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/783103/biztalk-2010-the-type-initializer-for-microsoft-biztalk-as2-pipelines-biztalkpropertylist-threw-an-exception</link><author>Yang at Innovative Architects</author><category>Bug</category><title>BizTalk 2010 - The type initializer for 'Microsoft.BizTalk.AS2.Pipelines.BizTalkPropertyList' threw an exception.</title><description>BizTalk 2010 with CU5

When trying to use "Transmit file name in MIME header" option in party agreement configuration, with the following option:

    Specify file name: %FILE.ReceivedFIleName%

The AS2 HTTP send port was suspended with the following error:

There was a failure executing the send pipeline: "Anderson.TraceLink.Shared.Pipelines.AS2SendArchive, Anderson.TraceLink.Shared, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=ff722a32a36f662c" Source: "AS2 encoder" Send Port: "Send_AS2_In...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 783103</description><a10:updated>2013-04-05T15:07:11-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">783053</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/783053/using-sso-configuration-source-with-esb-toolkit-2-2-fails</link><author>Vladimir Kirnishni</author><category>Bug</category><title>Using SSO Configuration Source with ESB Toolkit 2.2 Fails</title><description>
This error happens when trying to configure ESB Toolkit 2.2 that ships with BizTalk Server 2013. 

If SSO Configuration Source is selected, trying to Apply Configuration results in the following error:

Exception calling "Load" with "1" argument(s): "Could not load file or assembly 'Microsoft.BizTalk.Interop.SSOClient, Version=5.0.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKey Token=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified."
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 783053</description><a10:updated>2013-04-05T06:33:41-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">782106</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/782106/biztalk-2010-ftp-adapter-stops-polling-occasionally</link><author>Otso Lonka</author><category>Bug</category><title>BizTalk 2010 FTP Adapter Stops Polling Occasionally</title><description>BizTalk 2010 FTP adapter stops polling occasionally in passive mode. The problem has occurred few times within last 6 months. It seems that the adapter just hangs in some point - network monitor did show no attempts to get files from the FTP server. 

The last adapter log entries:

&lt; 220 Serv-U UK FTP Server v7.2 ready...
&gt; USER xxxx
&lt; 331 User name okay, need password.
&gt; PASS xxxx
&lt; 230 User logged in, proceed.
&gt; PWD
&lt; 257 "/" is current directory.
&gt; PWD
&lt; 257 "/" is current directory.
&gt; PWD
&lt; ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 782106</description><a10:updated>2013-03-26T01:55:01-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">781225</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/781225/add-support-net-dataset-diffgrams</link><author>Tough Rater</author><category>Bug</category><title>Add support .NET DataSet/diffgrams</title><description>BizTalk Mapper and ports should support mapping to and from .NET System.Data.DataSet schemas. Many Microsoft solutions only work with DataSets (e.g., SQL Server, Dynamics AX AIF Query Services), so support for DataSets is essential. The hoops one has to jump through to support the diffgram and &lt;any&gt; structures in DataSets are tremendously time-consuming, error-prone, and/or memory-decremental.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 3 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 1 workaround, 0 comments, feedback id: 781225</description><a10:updated>2013-03-12T11:31:08-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">781224</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/781224/add-support-for-any-nodes-in-maps</link><author>Tough Rater</author><category>Bug</category><title>Add support for &lt;any&gt; nodes in Maps</title><description>BizTalk Mapper should support mapping &lt;any&gt; elements. Many industry-agnostic solutions make use of xsd:any, including STAR in automotive retail and the SOAP protocol itself for fault reporting. The hoops one has to go through to support &lt;any&gt; are tremendously time-consuming and error-prone.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 3 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 781224</description><a10:updated>2013-03-12T11:27:51-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">781216</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/781216/allow-returning-typed-soap-faults-wcf-fault-contracts-in-wcf-publishing</link><author>Tough Rater</author><category>Bug</category><title>Allow returning typed SOAP faults (WCF Fault Contracts) in WCF Publishing</title><description>BizTalk currently does not support returning typed SOAP faults (WCF Fault Contracts) when an orchestration is published as a WCF service. Although Microsoft claims this is "by design," it is hard to justify the lack of support of typed faults because they can be essential for many business processes. In fact, all major Microsoft integration products -- Dynamics AX AIF, WCF, SQL Server and many others -- support typed faults, but these are lost if messages are brokered through BizTalk.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 6 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 781216</description><a10:updated>2013-03-12T10:20:30-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">781215</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/781215/esb-toolkit-2-2-configuration-tool-error-display</link><author>Colin Meade</author><category>Bug</category><title>ESB Toolkit 2.2 Configuration Tool Error Display</title><description>When an error is encountered in the ESB Configuration Tool, it can be difficult to read the full error description.

http://midheach.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/esbtconfigurationconnectionerror.jpg

There is a tooltip which is of some assistance but when the error description is big it takes a number of attempts to read it in full through the tooltip.

It would be useful to have the ability to click on the error and have a message box display the full description along with copy functional...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 781215</description><a10:updated>2013-03-12T10:16:47-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">776925</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/776925/a4swift-support-for-new-currency-code-zmw</link><author>alextil</author><category>Bug</category><title>A4SWIFT support for new currency code (ZMW)</title><description>I have a client who is receiving MT940's in the new ZMW currency code.  These are failing validation in the SWIFT accelerator as the currency code doesn't appear to be included in the vocabulary for the latest 2012 message pack.   There are other currencies that were updated in 2012 but this is the only one that is impacting my client. I'm using BTS 2010 with cumulative rollup 5.   Extract from the SWIFT online KB below with more details.   


New currency in Zambia (ZMW) 
As per ISO 4217 Amendm...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 776925</description><a10:updated>2013-01-18T11:35:07-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">776107</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/776107/export-btt-file-from-tpe-using-command-line</link><author>BizTalk - Paris</author><category>Bug</category><title>Export btt file from TPE using Command Line</title><description>I would like to script different things in BizTalk Server.  One of the issues I am facing is that I cannot export btt files from the TPE using command line. This would allow me to get the version of TPE currently used by an activty and modify it accordingly with command line. 

I can use the bm.exe get-activities to list the activities, ideally I would like to use something like bm.exe export-activitydefinition &lt;mybttfile.btt&gt; to get my btt file

Thanks
Stefan 
http://www.itsconsulting.fr&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 776107</description><a10:updated>2013-01-09T01:25:40-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">772720</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/772720/confusing-naming-in-biztalk</link><author>Tord G.Nordahl</author><category>Bug</category><title>Confusing naming in BizTalk</title><description>I won't call this a bug, rather and improvement of the product. 

Global Tracking, this is the most commonly used name for the group-level tracking option in BizTalk. However after this setting was moved into BizTalk Administration Console the names have changed into "Enable Group Level Tracking". This should be changed into "Enable Global Tracking" to remove the confusion.

When it comes to the host settings the thresholds have been moved into the administration console. However confusing namin...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 772720</description><a10:updated>2012-11-29T05:19:02-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">771992</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/771992/schemas-and-maps-errors-when-validating-or-generating-instances</link><author>F.Hauteco</author><category>Bug</category><title>Schemas and Maps Errors when Validating or generating instances.</title><description>This can be easily reproduced.

In a specific situation, we get the following Error message : "Input String was not in a correct format." when performing the following actions.
- Validate Schema on a Schema
- Validate Instance on a schema
- Generate Instance of a schema
- Test Map on a Map
- Validate Map
- Debug Map

This is happening with VS2010 and Biztalk 2010 and VS2012 and Biztalk 2013.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 771992</description><a10:updated>2012-11-22T13:18:45-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">771745</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/771745/namespace-type-name-hiding-occurs-in-biztalk-map-code-resulting-in-compilation-error-cs0234</link><author>Henrik Sandqvist</author><category>Bug</category><title>Namespace/type name hiding occurs in BizTalk map code resulting in compilation error CS0234</title><description>Compiler error CS0234 occurs when compiling a BizTalk project with referenced types (project or assemblies)

Assembly 1 contains the map source schema in namespace 'Common.Applications.Schemas
Assembly 2 contains the map target schema in namespace 'Applications.Common.Canonical'
The map project shares the first part of the namespace with one of the referenced projects, example Common.Processing.MyApp

Result: Project can not be built due to CS0234&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 771745</description><a10:updated>2012-11-20T08:16:31-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">771655</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/771655/pop3-adapter-not-picking-up-emails</link><author>Dipesh A</author><category>Bug</category><title>POP3 adapter not picking up emails</title><description>Hi,

I have recently had a case where the POP3 adapter had issues connecting to the Exchange Server and later recovered as Exchange Server became available.

However, what I have observed is that the pop3 adapter had stopped picking up emails from the mailbox (even though the receive location was showing as enabled).

The below warning was observed that seemed to have kicked off the issue (I have removed server names and IP addresses):

The adapter "POP3" raised an error message. Details "The PO...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 771655</description><a10:updated>2012-11-19T15:19:09-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">770880</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/770880/esb-toolkit-2-2-and-biztalk-2013-beta</link><author>Peter Borremans</author><category>Bug</category><title>ESB Toolkit 2.2 and BizTalk 2013 BETA</title><description>The ESB Toolkit binaries are upgraded to version 2.2 in the BizTalk Server 2013 BETA.

However, the including binding files, install documentation, BRE policy files, BRE vocabulary files are all still version 2.1! (I used the 'Install ESB Toolkit from the BizTalk Setup Wizard).

Also, all sample projects that are provided with the ESB Toolkit are still in Visual Studio 2010 format. I would make sense to migrate them to Visual Studio 2012.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 5 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 770880</description><a10:updated>2012-11-13T04:45:49-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">760465</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/760465/ordered-delivery-for-orchestrations</link><author>Leonid Ganeline</author><category>Bug</category><title>Ordered Delivery for Orchestrations</title><description>BizTalk Server version Next, Ordered Delivery and Zombies
It might be possible the BizTalk Server version Next will implement the automatic Ordered Delivery for Orchestrations, with pattern similar to the Ordered Delivery in Send Ports.

Three new Orchestration parameters are shown up there [please, see the file]: Ordered Delivery, Stop on Exception, and Recycle Interval (in seconds). Maybe the "Recycle After [N] messages are received [sent]" would be helpful for one more scenario.

 Ordered Del...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 760465</description><a10:updated>2012-08-30T14:39:04-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">759328</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/759328/creating-new-version-of-vocabulary</link><author>Ramakrishna P Mittapally</author><category>Bug</category><title>creating new version of vocabulary</title><description>To add new version of vocabulary generally we copy the previous version and keep adding new vocabulary as new version. the problem doing this is the vocabulary that we copied would refer to the older version of the dll's and do not refer new version of dll's.

the work around currently would be export the vocabulary as xml and change the xml manually to refer newer version of dlls.

this could be simplified as the vocabulary should dynamically refer newest version of dlls.
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 759328</description><a10:updated>2012-08-23T21:27:29-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">758422</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/758422/improvement-orchestration-test-engine</link><author>Anand P Singh</author><category>Bug</category><title>Improvement# Orchestration Test Engine</title><description>This is not a bug, however a suggestion to improve devlopment effort for BizTalk Orchestartion

Each time we develop a orchestartion we need to deploy and set the artifatcs before we do actual testing which will take 15-20 min.

Will it be possible to provide a Orchestration Test engine with BizTalk Development kit (Similar to WebDev.WebServer20.EXE). &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 4 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 758422</description><a10:updated>2012-08-16T20:24:28-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">746307</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/746307/ftp-adapter-to-support-tunnel-proxy-type</link><author>Dgrospelier</author><category>Bug</category><title>FTP adapter to support 'Tunnel' proxy type</title><description>Hello,
In a future release, can you add support for Tunnel proxy in the FTP adapter. In the current release, only SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 proxy are supported.
Thanks.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 746307</description><a10:updated>2012-06-04T07:06:25-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">743971</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/743971/esb-2-1-fault-handling-bug</link><author>Caratacus</author><category>Bug</category><title>ESB 2.1 Fault Handling Bug</title><description>We have upgraded from ESB 2.0 to ESB 2.1 and found a bug in the ESB Exception handling mechanism. We trap errors in our orchestration and create &amp; send an ESB fault as per the documentation:
 
ErrorMessage = Microsoft.Practices.ESB.ExceptionHandling.ExceptionMgmt.CreateFaultMessage();
 Microsoft.Practices.ESB.ExceptionHandling.ExceptionMgmt.AddMessage(ErrorMessage,SourceMsg);
 
The orchestration then sends the fault. However if the error message is &gt; 256 characters a BizTalk error is generated i...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 743971</description><a10:updated>2012-05-25T08:41:01-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">741640</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/741640/itinerary-designer-static-resolver-transport-location-property</link><author>Colin Meade</author><category>Bug</category><title>Itinerary Designer Static Resolver Transport Location Property</title><description>The following error is received when exporting an Itinerary from the Itinerary Designer.

The property 'TransportLocation' in element 'ResolveEndpoint' has an invalid character ';'

The Itinerary validates without any errors.

This occurs when using the Static Resolver and the WCF-Custom transport. The Transport Location property that causes the error has an SAP URI of

sap://USER=xxx;PASSWD=xxx;CLIENT=xxx;LANG=EN;@A/sapservername/xx?RfcSdkTrace=False&amp;AbapDebug=False&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 741640</description><a10:updated>2012-05-11T02:02:06-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">737929</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/737929/wcf-netnamedpipe-adapter-is-not-disposing-of-channelfactory</link><author>TheDavester</author><category>Bug</category><title>WCF-NetNamedPipe Adapter Is Not Disposing of ChannelFactory</title><description>
I have a WCF service, hosted in IIS 7.5 / WAS, that is exposed through an endpoint using the NetNamedPipe binding. I am sending to this service via a Solicit-Response send port using the WCF-NetNamedPipe adapter. This send port is not using SSO.

The trace log for this service rapidly accumulates "Throwing an exception" trace entries (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/System.ServiceModel.Diagnostics.ThrowingException.aspx) in the root activity that are recording the following two exceptio...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 737929</description><a10:updated>2012-04-20T08:08:33-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">734549</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/734549/weekly-schedule-of-receive-location</link><author>Carlos T. _</author><category>Bug</category><title>Weekly Schedule of Receive Location</title><description>We have several receive locations that should not process any files over the weekend. I have always wanted to see BT allow me to set up on the Receive Location (RL) to not only say what times I can process files, but also what days. In other words, I think it would be extremely helpful to turn on the RL using the daily and weekly schedules. 

Our workaround is to script a job to turn off the RL and use the Windows scheduler to turn the RL on and off, but it would make much more sense to do tha...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 5 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 2 comments, feedback id: 734549</description><a10:updated>2012-03-30T05:40:50-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">726723</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/726723/pop3-adapter-failed-to-decode-the-s-mime-message</link><author>Axel Schulze</author><category>Bug</category><title>POP3 adapter - Failed to decode the S/MIME message</title><description>On our BizTalk Server we have an error regarding received email messages with the POP3 adapter.

The error message is "There was an authentication failure. "Failed to decode the S/MIME message. The S/MIME message may not be valid."

BizTalk Server 2009, CU 2

Configuration:
- POP3 receive location
- custom receive pipeline
- apply MIME Decoding = true
- basic authentication

It seems it has something to do with the length of the header of the message. After installing CU2 for BizTalk 2009 I was ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 3 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 3 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 726723</description><a10:updated>2012-02-27T02:18:46-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">725311</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/725311/orchestration-annotations</link><author>Matt Ronau</author><category>Bug</category><title>Orchestration Annotations</title><description>It would be nice to be able to add annotations within an orchestration, similar to the annotations you can place within an SSIS package.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 4 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 725311</description><a10:updated>2012-02-16T13:05:47-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">718126</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/718126/issue-with-receive-location-service-window</link><author>Dipesh A</author><category>Bug</category><title>Issue with receive location service window</title><description>Hi,

We are using BizTalk 2009 in production and just noticed that the service window did not stop according to the window set  (1:45-3:15 AM) and the messages were still sitting in the receive location hours after the window(even at 11:00 AM) . This caused a build up of messages in the pickup folder.

As soon as the service window checkbox was unchecked, the receive location came to life and all messages were picked up from the pickup folder.

Is this a known issue or a bug?

Regards,
...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 718126</description><a10:updated>2012-01-11T16:47:53-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">712237</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/712237/bts-messagetype-gets-overwritten-when-copying-context-to-a-dynamically-transformed-message-in-bts-2006-r2-sp1-cu3</link><author>Henrik Sandqvist</author><category>Bug</category><title>BTS.MessageType gets overwritten when copying context to a dynamically transformed message in BTS 2006 R2 SP1+CU3</title><description>When using a dynamically applied transform in a Message Construct/Assignment shape in a orchestration to map between two untyped messages (XmlDocuments) and also copying the context from the input message to the output message the read-only property BTS.MessageType gets overwritten with the value from the the input message.

Typical code in a message assignment shape:

mapType = System.Type.GetType("map-class and assembly full name goes here")
transform (OutboundMessage) = mapType(InboundMessage...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 712237</description><a10:updated>2011-12-07T09:17:09-08:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">698568</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/698568/using-a-schema-that-references-another-that-is-used-by-a-map-causes-error-in-management-console</link><author>Jon Fancey</author><category>Bug</category><title>Using a schema that references another, that is used by a map, causes error in Management Console</title><description>In BTS 2010 RTM - A schema is created that references another schema, using a type from that schema as its root node. A map is then created that references this root node in its mapping. This will deploy correctly but cause an error in the management console when it is refreshed - "Schema referenced by map xxx has been deleted". Looking at the tables in the management database, this is caused by the xx_docspec_name column in the bt_mapspec table missing the +rootnodename value. I've attached a s...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 698568</description><a10:updated>2011-11-02T13:58:16-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">696429</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/696429/or-functoid-does-not-map-correctly-in-biztalk-2010</link><author>jsprenkle</author><category>Bug</category><title>or functoid does not map correctly in biztalk 2010</title><description>Map produces an empty node in output file that should be suppressed.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 696429</description><a10:updated>2011-10-24T12:05:40-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">695475</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/695475/the-default-editor-of-dataset-file-changed-to-biztalk-editor-after-installing-ms-biztalk-server</link><author>MS-Moderator09</author><category>Bug</category><title>The default editor of dataset file changed to BizTalk editor after installing MS BizTalk Server</title><description>After installing MS BizTalk Server, the default editor of dataset file(*xsd) changed from "DataSet Editor" to "BizTalk Editor".

I encounter this issue on Windows Server 2008 R2 with Visual Studio 2010 Sp1. 
Connect Issue Related: 
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/694639/dataset-designer#details&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 695475</description><a10:updated>2011-10-18T01:22:28-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">693199</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/693199/cannot-use-msbuild-when-a-flat-file-schema-has-a-promoted-property</link><author>Andrew Babiec</author><category>Bug</category><title>Cannot use msbuild when a Flat File Schema has a Promoted Property</title><description>Has anyone run into the following msbuild error with BizTalk 2010
 
SampleFlatFileSchema.xsd.cs(10,66): error CS0400: The type or namespace name 'mySampleId' could not be found in the global namespace (are you missing an assembly reference?)

How to reproduce:
 
1.) Create a property schema
2.) Create a flat file schema
3.) Promote a property field in the flat file schema using 1
4.) Builds locally in Visual Studio
5.) Fails when building via TFS/msbuild with the error above.
 
Regul...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 1 validation, 0 workarounds, 2 comments, feedback id: 693199</description><a10:updated>2011-10-05T08:28:20-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">691612</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/691612/how-to-remove-soapaction-from-a-wcf-service-which-is-exposed-from-biztalk</link><author>Shankar Balaji</author><category>Bug</category><title>How to remove SoapAction from a WCF service which is exposed from BizTalk</title><description>Hello,
 
I have exposed my schema as a WCF service. My client wants to consume this service, but doesnt wants to send a SOAP action from their side( This is because they already have a live implementation and I have produced my WCF service from their schema files )

Below is the link I have raised it in BizTalk MSDN forums
 
Thanks
 
Shankar
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 691612</description><a10:updated>2011-09-29T04:12:33-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">687382</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/687382/add-your-own-query-to-the-diztalk-admin-console</link><author>Well0549</author><category>Bug</category><title>Add your own query to the DIzTalk Admin Console</title><description>With BT 2006 you had the BizTalk Healt and Activity tracking tool. This tool allowed you to type a query and execute it.

In fact the Healt and Activity tracking tool was a kind of generic SQL client. Any query would go as long as you had enough rights. I liked this functionality cause you could add your own queries and make it look like they belonged to the original setup. I really liked that.

Now I have a kind of framework and I store a lot of info in the BAMPrimaryImport database. Now I woul...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 687382</description><a10:updated>2011-09-06T07:32:41-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">686247</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/686247/error-when-building-a-biztalk-2010-project-containing-an-orchestration-in-vs-2010</link><author>Howard S. Edidin</author><category>Bug</category><title>Error when building a BizTalk 2010 Project containing an Orchestration in VS 2010 </title><description>
These errors occurs in the ## orchestration code file!

error x2004: mismatched 'braces' '{}'

error x2254: unexpected keyword: 'module'

error x2254: unexpected keyword: 'service'

Open the Orchestration in a text editor and look at the end of the file. 

The following is an example of the problem:
[Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.BPELExportable(false)]
module FL.COM.BTS.PO.WMBridge.Orchestrations
{
    internal porttype WMBridgeExt_Type
    {
        oneway ProcessPO
        {
 ...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 686247</description><a10:updated>2011-08-30T17:48:01-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">685161</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/685161/wcf-basichttp-response-binding-iso8859-1-instead-of-utf-8</link><author>BizTalk - Paris</author><category>Bug</category><title>WCF-BasicHttp : Response binding ISO8859-1 instead of utf-8</title><description>I'm calling a distant WebService through a WCF-BasicHttp, and the Webservice's Response encoding is on ISO8859-1, below is the error :

The adapter failed to transmit message going to send port "xxx" with URL "http://xxx.lde:83/xxx/server.php". It will be retransmitted after the retry interval specified for this Send Port. Details:"System.ServiceModel.ProtocolException: The content type text/xml; charset=ISO-8859-1 of the response message does not match the content type of the binding (text/xml;...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 7 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 5 validations, 2 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 685161</description><a10:updated>2011-08-23T05:37:53-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">685054</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/685054/edifact-receive-schema-discovery-in-tpe-is-not-working</link><author>biztalk2010</author><category>Bug</category><title>EDIFACT Receive Schema Discovery in TPE is not working</title><description>Hi,

I fear the schema discovery for EDIFACT messages is not working properly in BizTalk 2010. 

I receive following EDIFACT message through the EDI Pipeline:

UNB+UNOA:3+SENDER:ZZZ+RECEIVER:ZZZ+110721:0612+2011028745++++++0'UNH+028745+ORDERS:D:96A:UN:EGC103'...

The message is correctly asigned to the right TPE business agreement. In the "Transaction Set Settings" - "Transaction Set List" I configured a default namespace and another namespace which is related to the message above (the second it...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 685054</description><a10:updated>2011-08-22T08:05:05-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">684879</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/684879/looking-for-non-existent-tom-resource-satellite-assembly</link><author>CharlesY</author><category>Bug</category><title>Looking for non-existent TOM resource (Satellite) assembly</title><description>We are seeing an intermittent bug in the Visual Studio tooling for BizTalk Server 2010 in which we are unable to build BTS projects.  An error message is repeatedly shown saying that the system "Could not find file ‘Microsoft.BizTalk.TOM.resources". 

I suspect that this may be casued by searching for a non-existant satellite assembly for Microsoft.BizTalk.TOM.dll, but this is a guess.  The error may be thrown in System.Reflector.RuntimeAssembly.InternalGetSatelliteAssembly which is at the end...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 684879</description><a10:updated>2011-08-19T14:31:27-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">684510</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/684510/issue-polling-wcf-oracledb-adapter</link><author>BizTalk - Paris</author><category>Bug</category><title>Issue polling WCF-OracleDb adapter</title><description>I am facing issue when I try to do polling using the WCF-OracleDb Adapter, so after importing the schemas in Visual Studio, deployed the solution I get the following error 

WCF-OracleDB: unexpected start node NODE with namespace "http://Microsoft.LobServices.OracleDB/2007/03/USER/Package
The receive location "xxx.Oracle.xxx.Loc" with URL "oracledb://xxx/" is shutting down. Details:"Microsoft.ServiceModel.Channels.Common.XmlReaderParsingException: Unexpected start node "NODE" with namespace "htt...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 2 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 684510</description><a10:updated>2011-08-17T08:03:34-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">682846</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/682846/biztalk-2010-training-content-archive-is-corrupt</link><author>JAgostoni</author><category>Bug</category><title>BizTalk 2010 Training Content Archive is Corrupt</title><description>The BizTalk 2010 training materials seem to contain corrupted archives when trying to extract the VHDs.  The contens is available here:
http://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=14865

Myself and other team members have attempted to download the archive files and cannot get all the VHDs extracted.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 682846</description><a10:updated>2011-08-03T12:20:30-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">682739</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/682739/add-a-dedicated-macroed-file-property-for-custom-filenames</link><author>Nick Walker</author><category>Bug</category><title>Add a dedicated macro'ed FILE property for custom filenames</title><description>Currently, the most widely-used option for customizing output filenames from the FILE adapter is to write a value to FILE.ReceivedFileName. This is not the intended use of this property (as judged simply by its name). The FILE adapter would benefit from an additional FILE property and macro designated solely for customization of output filenames.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 682739</description><a10:updated>2011-08-02T17:44:32-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">675874</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/675874/documented-steps-to-configure-biztalk-admin-tools-on-a-client-machine-to-remotely-administer-a-biztalk-2010-server</link><author>LavanJeeva</author><category>Bug</category><title>Documented steps to configure Biztalk Admin tools on a client machine to remotely administer a biztalk 2010 server</title><description>There is no documented configuration steps to configure a client with the biztalk admin tools to remotely administer a biztalk server. We were having errors with when trying to remotely configure send ports. After working with Microsoft Support we were able to fix.

In our environment, the biztalk administrator is not a member of the local administrator group on the biztalk server and doesn't have remote desktop connectivity to the server.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 675874</description><a10:updated>2011-06-17T12:09:31-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">668362</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/668362/the-pipelinecompilertask-task-failed-unexpectedly</link><author>skeltech</author><category>Bug</category><title>The "PipelineCompilerTask" task failed unexpectedly</title><description>After installing Cumulative update package 1 for BizTalk Server 2009
to fix VSTS 510054 (leap year issue), project will not compile. The following error is returned:


Error	211	The "PipelineCompilerTask" task failed unexpectedly.
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Retrieving the COM class factory for component with CLSID {DCB8C90C-B4B7-47A1-A080-5AA6DDDC2E44} failed due to the following error: 80070002.
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.BizTalkProject.Compiler.PipelineCompiler.Compile(BizTalkBui...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 2 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 668362</description><a10:updated>2011-05-13T07:25:19-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">668318</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/668318/the-biztalk-server-ftp-adapter-does-not-retrieve-files-successfully-from-an-ibm-aix-based-ftp-server-that-is-set-to-the-fr-fr-locale</link><author>ZeBobo5</author><category>Bug</category><title>The BizTalk Server FTP adapter does not retrieve files successfully from an IBM AIX-based FTP server that is set to the fr_FR locale</title><description>The BizTalk Server FTP adapter does not retrieve files successfully from an IBM AIX-based FTP server that is set to the fr_FR locale

The KB967606 is not applied to BizTalk 2010 !!!&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 0 workarounds, 0 comments, feedback id: 668318</description><a10:updated>2011-05-13T01:27:14-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">667424</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/667424/tracking-settings-in-binding-files-incorrectly-handled</link><author>vrouet1</author><category>Bug</category><title>Tracking settings in Binding files incorrectly handled</title><description>Regarding the handling of the orchestration tracking options: a deployment package will keep the tracking options setting that is set on the environment where the package was generated from.
The import of a binding file will then modify these tracking options based on the values set in the field TrackingOption="ServicesStartEnd....". This works fine for any combination.
However, if this field is set to TrackingOption="None" (no tracking at all) the binding file import does not correctly set/re...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 10 Up-Votes, 1 Down-Vote, 9 validations, 0 workarounds, 3 comments, feedback id: 667424</description><a10:updated>2011-05-09T07:27:23-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">663627</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/663627/wcf-service-publishing-wizard-read-previous-settings</link><author>twhensley</author><category>Bug</category><title>WCF Service Publishing Wizard - read previous settings</title><description>I know the WCF Service Publishing Wizard shows you the service description at the end, and even saves them in the IIS folders.  But there is no way to use this file as INPUT to the wizard.  

This forces you to either start from scratch with the wizard or modify the XML of the service description by hand.  It would be nice to be able to use the wizard to modify an existing service description.  Especially during development when requirements are changing rapidly.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 1 Up-Vote, 0 Down-Votes, 0 validations, 1 workaround, 0 comments, feedback id: 663627</description><a10:updated>2011-04-20T10:31:06-07:00</a10:updated></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">657429</guid><link>http://connect.microsoft.com/BizTalk/feedback/details/657429/increasing-number-of-grid-columns-in-looping-functoid-causes-visual-studio-to-crash</link><author>Wacka</author><category>Bug</category><title>Increasing number of grid columns in looping functoid causes Visual Studio to crash</title><description>Increasing the number of grid columns in a looping functoid that already exists inside a BizTalk map causes Visual Studio to crash. I have reproduced this issue with multiple a couple different maps, using different source/destination schema structures.

Here is the error that's saved to the event log for the Windows Error Reporting event associated with the crash (which is easy to reproduce, following the steps I included):

Fault bucket 1528396393, type 5
Event Name: CLR20r3
Response: Not avai...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Status: Active, 2 Up-Votes, 0 Down-Votes, 3 validations, 0 workarounds, 1 comment, feedback id: 657429</description><a10:updated>2011-04-05T09:42:35-07:00</a10:updated></item></channel></rss>