Rvalue reference overloading rules - by weibing

Status : 

  Fixed<br /><br />
		This item has been fixed in the current or upcoming version of this product.<br /><br />
		A more detailed explanation for the resolution of this particular item may have been provided in the comments section.


1
1
Sign in
to vote
ID 725876 Comments
Status Closed Workarounds
Type Bug Repros 0
Opened 2/21/2012 1:43:24 AM
Access Restriction Public
Moderator Decision Sent to Engineering Team for consideration

Description

void Foo(int*&&)
{
}

void Foo(int*&)
{
}

int main()
{
    Foo(new int); //will call "void Foo(int*&)"
    Foo(new int()); //will call "void Foo(int*&&)". initialize POD to zero will also affect efficiency
    return 0;
}
Sign in to post a comment.
Posted by Microsoft on 4/29/2014 at 12:24 PM
Thank you for reporting this issue. This issue has been fixed in Visual Studio 2013. You can install a trial version of Visual Studio 2013 with the fix from: http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9832436
Posted by Microsoft on 2/22/2012 at 2:13 PM
Hi:
    A fix for this issue has been checked into the compiler sources. The fix should show up in the next release of Visual C++.

Xiang Fan
Visual C++ Team
Posted by MS-Moderator09 [Feedback Moderator] on 2/21/2012 at 9:29 PM
Thank you for submitting feedback on Visual Studio 2010 and .NET Framework. Your issue has been routed to the appropriate VS development team for review. We will contact you if we require any additional information.
Posted by MS-Moderator01 on 2/21/2012 at 2:42 AM
Thank you for your feedback, we are currently reviewing the issue you have submitted. If this issue is urgent, please contact support directly(http://support.microsoft.com)