Initializer list in a lambda crashes - by Aaron J Ballman

Status : 

  Fixed<br /><br />
		This item has been fixed in the current or upcoming version of this product.<br /><br />
		A more detailed explanation for the resolution of this particular item may have been provided in the comments section.


1
0
Sign in
to vote
ID 743303 Comments
Status Closed Workarounds
Type Bug Repros 0
Opened 5/23/2012 9:39:59 AM
Access Restriction Public

Description

The following reduced testcase produces an ICE with the compiler.  If you modify the code slightly, it produces an incorrect compile error.
Sign in to post a comment.
Posted by Microsoft on 5/24/2012 at 10:25 AM
Hi:
    A fix for this issue has been checked into the compiler sources. The fix should show up in the next release of Visual C++.

Xiang Fan
Visual C++ Team
Posted by MS-Moderator10 [Feedback Moderator] on 5/23/2012 at 11:25 PM
Thanks for your feedback.

We are rerouting this issue to the appropriate group within the Visual Studio Product Team for triage and resolution. These specialized experts will follow-up with your issue.
Posted by Aaron J Ballman on 5/23/2012 at 10:21 AM
Also note that moving the structure declaration to the top level changes the behavior.

1) Local to function == causes crash/error
2) At translation unit level, with static const declaration == causes internal error with the compiler

fatal error C1001: An internal error has occurred in the compiler.
1> (compiler file 'f:\dd\vctools\compiler\utc\src\p2\p2symtab.c', line 5858)
1> To work around this problem, try simplifying or changing the program near the locations listed above.
1> Please choose the Technical Support command on the Visual C++
1> Help menu, or open the Technical Support help file for more information

3) At translation unit level, without static const declaration == compiles cleanly
Posted by MS-Moderator01 on 5/23/2012 at 9:42 AM
Thank you for your feedback, we are currently reviewing the issue you have submitted. If this issue is urgent, please contact support directly(http://support.microsoft.com)
Posted by Aaron J Ballman on 5/23/2012 at 9:41 AM
Note that removing the static const has no effect on the outcome.